File: IMG_1934.jpg (41 KB, 349x642)

41 KB JPG

>>4307705

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	349
Image Height	642
Scene Capture Type	Standard

You are all wrong, this effect is coming from a very slow shutter speed, look how blurred the horses feet are, a classic sign of slow shutter speed.

>>4307725
Horse feet move when they're running, buildings don't move. Notice how blurred the building in the background is?

>>4307726
>buildings don't move
source??

>>4307714
mong isn't a name of any ethnicity, that would be mongol instead you fucking mongoloid

File: DSCF0194.jpg (2.06 MB, 2000x3000)

2.06 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	84 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:22 23:13:21
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	0.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	56.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2000
Image Height	3000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	OK
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

File: DSCF0209.jpg (1.66 MB, 3000x2000)

1.66 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro2
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	84 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:23 01:15:01
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Brightness	-2.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	56.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3000
Image Height	2000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Blur Status	OK
Chroma Saturation	Normal
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Auto Exposure Status	OK
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Focus Status	OK
Picture Mode	Manual Exposure
Sharpness	Normal
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
White Balance	Auto

File: IMGP3331.jpg (426 KB, 1600x1200)

426 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX Optio S
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:31 01:10:17
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Down
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: IMGP3353bw.jpg (346 KB, 1200x1600)

346 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	PENTAX Corporation
Camera Model	PENTAX Optio S
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.36
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:31 01:24:09
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1600
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Down
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSCF8906.jpg (3.05 MB, 3000x2000)

3.05 MB JPG

>>4306787
Anything can be art though, can't it?
Gotta back up "ugly" results with some kind of idea though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-Pro3
Camera Software	Digital Camera X-Pro3 Ver1.31
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Maker Note Version	0130
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:01:19 19:18:43
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	6400
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	-0.3 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6240
Image Height	4160
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
Sharpness	Unknown
White Balance	Auto
Chroma Saturation	Unknown
Flash Mode	Unknown
Focus Mode	Auto
Slow Synchro Mode	Off
Picture Mode	Aperture Prior AE
Continuous/Bracketing Mode	Off
Blur Status	OK
Focus Status	OK
Auto Exposure Status	OK

File: IMG_3777.jpg (747 KB, 2048x1152)

747 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Photographer	jjgd
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:15 00:50:48
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	47.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: laughing.jpg (51 KB, 634x318)

51 KB JPG

>>4306787
>offensive to the ideals of art

>>4301983
these are epic, man. love the fishbowl effect across all the images as a series. you've got to make a book!

>>4301988
this is the best one. the curved fishbowl wraparound, the girl in red being the focus. keep making these until you've got a collection of 100, and make a book

>>4306238
It has detail. The individual hairs are there. Just not as contrasty. Too sharp of a lens and it looks like a 3d render or AI enhanced. Why do you think mirrorless portraits shot with flawless lenses like the nikon noct and plena look uncanny before retouching? Human vision isnt nearly that sharp. If nikon had a 100mp camera you could crop super sharp 5mp images out of it, the sharpest 5mp has ever been, with the plena attached. It’s actually too much.

>>4305872
>Correct, now is the time to buy at inflated prices due to all the youtubers hyping them up. The real time to buy was years ago

these lenses are like $60 with free shipping faggot. have fun when they are $200 in a couple years.

>>4307249
i'm the anon that is in armenia, they're about $20 WITH the zenit cameras here, it's cheap as fuck

>>4304170
Here is the list of most common ones with description and tests

https://radojuva.com/en/photo-review/#russian

File: 1714112463058.jpg (48 KB, 1000x667)

48 KB JPG

>>4304170
>soviet glass to L mount
10/10 op thank you

Just get a Pentax DSLR. Or a Nikon Z6 and adapter.

>>4307602
>60 funny monies
>I will like to keep my focal length
look m8, you can get a Pentax K10d for that much and even then its APS-C, good news no need for a PK adapter since it will work just fine, and the m42 lenses will just need an adapter that is less than 10 bucks.

under 600 you say?

canon 5diii

Just save up an extra £300 and get an A7, if you can't manage that then you're incredibly poor and should pick a different hobby. It will be so much better than a 40D (I own both), field of view with your lenses will be the same as you're used to with film and an EVF with focus peaking is so much better than using a crop body viewfinder with a split prism (an aftermarket focus screen will probably cost you half your budget for the body).

>>4307602
Get rid of all your Pentax lenses for Nikon lenses and get a DF for a proper SLR feel.

File: 65869513.png (161 KB, 781x688)

161 KB PNG

Do they make cages for 600D/t3i?
Specifically I want the threaded holes on the side.
would other canon cages fit? I'm fine with chinesium

File: Screenshot_20240505-173344.png (709 KB, 996x732)

709 KB PNG

>>4306338
>Covering face to hide identity
>Coofid cuck muzzle around neck

>>4310443
You can get universal L brackets with a bunch of threaded holes on the vertical part

is the nikon 50/1.4g worth $400 when I can get teh 1.4d for $150? I'm not a stickler for IQ, and inclined to think the marginal gains of the g are probably not worth it. also do I -have- to use the aperture ring on the d or will the camera (d850) be able to adjust it?

I'm getting into photography because I inherited two film cameras(Fed 4 and Nikon F301). While they are pretty cool and want to learn to shoot with them, film is very expensive where I live, so I'm mostly relegated to leaving them for special occasions, and wanted to get a digital camera to have everyday in order to practice especially with the controls. what are some models that have these features:
Portable, must fit in a jacket pocket
Full controls, especially if accessible with physical dials like in a film camera,
Has to have manual focus
Around $700 budget, may go up to 1k
ability to switch lenses is a positive but not required.

I guess I'm stuck between mirrorless, premium point and shoots and rangefinders. From what I've been looking around I've found someone in my country selling a Fujifilm X100F for about 600, and I'm kinda tempted to get it

>>4300934
>he bought a $3,000 lens to take snapshits of his cat

File: DSC_4838.jpg (4.13 MB, 3540x2832)

4.13 MB JPG

>>4306832
you wouldnt?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	794
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2022:05:25 17:40:18
Exposure Time	1/2500 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3540
Image Height	2832
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: FB_IMG_1713863396806.jpg (59 KB, 1080x1618)

59 KB JPG

>>4306835
No, I bought a $100 lens to take snapshits of my dog. (Tamron 85mm f/1.8 VC, Nikon D800)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4306851
Good man

>>4296528
It is, wanting a "soft" lens for any subject is a meme for people high on fucking copium or deliberately wanting a visibly soft image not in focus. Usually for some meme artsy shit.
If you stop over baking images with post-process sharpening which literally highlights subtle textures and draws rings around it, "local contrast" which emphasizes any redness or gradients, and any other form of "slider" that retards who use Adobe software use all the time, you want a sharp lens.

Optical sharpness is the goal. Always has been, always will be.
Stop applying fake sharpness and you'll see how soft optics usually are, and then you'll be able to appreciate TRUE sharpness, from sharp glass, when you can simply not apply the fake shit.

There's literally no such thing as too sharp.
All instances of such a thing (and I mean ALL) where people even reference lenses being "too sharp" are always from retards looking at baked images. They're usually using Adobe software with sliders cranked up (defaults, btw) or they have sharpening enabled that they're not even aware of like with Adobe's "capture sharpening" bullshit that they might be oblivious to.
Everyone crying about stuff being too sharp is always busted for being an overbaked faggot if any research is done.
For example, anyone using dehaze/"local contrast"/curves/enhancements.

File: 100781780_295617584766971(...).jpg (29 KB, 1920x1280)

29 KB JPG

in 2017 I took a photo of my penis with the eclipse but it didn't turn out very good because i was very cold

>>>posted 9 days ago
Did jannies forget about /p/?

>>4307588
This board moves almost as slowly as /gd/, janitors are busy putting out fires on /g/, a second there is like month here.

If you haven't had a film photo published in the 90s, you can never be trusted as a photographer and should be ignored.

>>4305130
See, what you need to do is get a friend to stand a good 100 yards away with a superzoom to get some forced perspective and equalize the size between the sun and your dick

All Australian dollars:
Leica M2 - $2.2k ish
Fuji 690 - $1.1k ish
Lenses - $3k ish
OVF and other accessories - $300
Photo books and art books - $1k ish
Add in hundreds for dev equipment, other misc stuff (not including film itself)

>>4307438
Typo: the second Tamron lens is an 85mm f/1.8.

>>4306686
Wow no one saw that coming

>>4307438
>All this to take snapshits of my family and frens.
based and loves their family and frens pilled.

>>4305078
497 euros

>>4303153
Nope. I would recommend a cambo wide, graflex slxw, sinar handy, or if you're feeling fiesty a linhof master technika with a cammed rodenstock 105mm. Any one should be perfect for your use case.

>>4303153
1/2.3" is small and noisy.
Lumix GX8 is cheaper and weather-sealed with dust and splash proof when paired with appropiate lenses and gives you more than decent quality photos
https://www.m43lenses.com/

>>4305995
Not one singe “weather sealed” camera, even pentax and nikon, comes close to the olympus tough

ALL weather sealing allows some water to enter. It just means your camera dies in years, not hours.

just use your phone

>>4303153
i'll let you in on a secret anon
sony rx0

File: IMG_1958.gif (28 KB, 480x325)

28 KB GIF

>>4305971
Ahem ackshually it has no mirror there is no reflex on this camera, it uses a beam splitting prism more akin to what we saw with Sony’s SLT cameras. It having ttl viewing doesn’t automatically make it reflex, chud, educate yourself.

>>4306183
so you lose a stop of light at the sensor and have a dim viewfinder image instead of having a flipping mirror. Nice!

>>4305971
oLIMPus, I mean OM Shitstem is always full of retardation. What the fuck are they even doing these days?

>>4307457
Man you suck, couldn't even come up with a good taunt.

Olympiss and OM Shitstain

You may thank me now.

>>4307442
So you never have mirror blackout or mirror slap and you can use the OVF during video. Nice!

>>4303953
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery (that mediocrity can pay to greatness).
>>4303982
Rent free
>>4304046
No I'm not, I'm the guy with the b&w boatpix.

>>4304051
>Imitation
Now for the reveal

I took that photo to send to my mom

File: Screenshot 2024-04-25 132454.png (228 KB, 778x854)

228 KB PNG

this is how i do it, i only use windows explorer folders, no tags or rating

>bulk photos folder
->[date, location, main subjects) (delete all awful photos)

>good photos folder
->[date, location, main subjects) (copy all good photos here)

>raw photos folder
->[date, location, main subjects) (move all good RAWs here)

>instagram worthy photos
->[date, location] (move best photos into separate set folders)
--> [subject 1] (crop and export to IG quality)
---> post ready

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4303938
I just do Year > Event Name, and then also have Q1-Q4 for misc snapshots.
I only browse / view the folders through C1, and just use C1 filtering as needed for searching by date or camera or lens. Switching from individual sessions from a few larger catalogs has been great. All exports go to the Output folder of the relevant session.

>>4303938
[YYYY-MM-DD (event/occasion label)]
-[raws]
-[jpg] (though lately I've just been skipping this and only shooting raw)
-[edited]
--[full size]
--[resize] (for shitstagram or showing my friends on discord or whatever)

Rinse and repeat. It just werks.

>>4305647
check out kurts camera repair in SD. they go way back and were/are an authorized service center for nikon, canon, and minolta. expect to wait at least a month to get it back, though

File: its just a red dot.jpg (40 KB, 750x1000)

40 KB JPG

>>4305661
motherfucker already got a leica tier german pistol so why not match it with an appropriate camera

>>4307227
Idk its a fine camera, this is the only problem I've had with it yet

>>4307302
for realsies though, send it off to a specialist or find some bum on craigslist who claims they repair cameras
its not like either of the options give you any warranty

Just buy an AE-1 instead.

>went walking in the woods today
>tried getting shots of a suspended widowmaker branch, didn't work well
>take a photo of the general area as I'm leaving
>pixel peeping later
>two weird little blurred areas at the bottom of the frame, like something transparent smudged on the lens, really out of focus pollen, etc. but nothing on the glass or in other photos
>try ENHANCEing, can almost see a sort of shape in one of them but know it's my eyes playing tricks trying to see something familiar out of blurry dead leaves and shit
>remember I was standing a few feet from the old family pet burial area
>get 2spooked, delete image on computer, delete off camera, curl up in a ball under my blanket and refuse to look away from computer screen until I stop shivering
And that's why anon doesn't have a recent photo to post.

>>4307164
>hi /p/ today I was a schizo thanks for reading my blog

>>4307165
sorry :(

File: bird.jpg (4.45 MB, 6458x3912)

4.45 MB JPG

>>4307113

at the same pond

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS R5
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/11.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:04:10 08:52:47
Exposure Time	1/3200 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Lens Aperture	f/7.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	500.00 mm
Image Width	6458
Image Height	3912
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4307113

Needs denoise now but better crop

>>4306712
>Be Canon
>Be completely retarded
>Call some camera "EF"
>Decade later call the lens mount "EF"

>>4306823
Yes, but the good thing is that the camera for that reason is avoiding the hipster tax since no influencers can shill it properly.

>>4306682
No need to have mechanically timed shutters. An electronically timed shutter like in a Nikon FE2 would be very simple and cheap to implement.

>>4307028
Even with mechanical shutter, it wouldn't be that big of a deal. The "Nikon" (actually made by Cosina) FM10 was a cheap, plastic-bodied, all mechanical f-mount SLR intended for sale to countries too backwards to have batteries(!), and it was not ended production until *2022*. Two years ago! The only thing preventing it from being what OP was asking for is the fact that it was plastic and looked like it was from the 1990's not the 1970's.

>>4306651
I'd guess the cost of a real, all-metal, all-mechanical SLR like the Nikon FM series, if made today, would be $1200 to $1500 USD.
This puts it at the same league as any number modern full frame digital cameras. Probably not many people would be willing to pay that for a niche novelty hobby item like a 35mm film camera. People who want to spend a lot of money on film cameras will shoot MF/LF. Look at it another way the ebay price of used cameras will need to rise to higher than that before it's anyone's interest to make them new.