File: IMG_1390.jpg (624 KB, 2048x1365)

624 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS RP
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:03 22:25:59
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_1383.jpg (3.99 MB, 6182x4121)

3.99 MB JPG

Also, great pictures here. Nice angles, some of them are pretty unobvious, but they work great.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS RP
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 21:06:53
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_1388.jpg (3.96 MB, 6240x4160)

3.96 MB JPG

>>4301127
I like that forest-y feel in that pic.
>>4301132
Cool angle. These wide hips are hawt.
>>4301133
Just overall good composition.
>>4301151
Super cool angle.
>>4301352
80s aesthetics. I like it.
>>4303695
>>4303696
These looks like 3d renders, but in a good way.

These are one of my favorites

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: blackeye.jpg (2.45 MB, 2800x1856)

2.45 MB JPG

>>4310652
Badges weirdly blurry, decent colors

>>4310651
oversaturated to hell, Ken Rockwell's whip lol

>>4310654
this foreground tree, why?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: blackeye2.jpg (2.57 MB, 2800x1856)

2.57 MB JPG

>>4310684

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: DSCF16884000px.jpg (2.32 MB, 4000x2667)

2.32 MB JPG

>>4309460
Nah it's fine
it's not a small lens, but it's a normal sized modern lens scaled down
It's got all the bells and whistles of an L of Art series lens, it's a complex construction optic

A bit big, but the WR and reliability of the quality may make it worth it to you

Don't know if I'd buy it again though, because I'm not sure I need all that, but then again now that I'm thinking about it, I can't really find another lens to fit this exact high-end niche

I love it for being a reliable brick with silent and fast autofocus, it's solid, it'll work in the rain snow or cold, and it has a fucking great feeling aperture ring

In conclusion, a bit heavy, a bit big, but it makes up for it in quality.
Do I need that much quality? Dunno
Do I want it when I'm travelling or shooting an event? Hell yeah


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4309996
I got the Sigma because I enjoy the 18-50 zoom so much. Compact with the same solid build quality. Images look fine to a pleb like me.

>>4310120
Is there any chance Sigma makes a 70-200(eq.) f2.8 for APSC in line with these zooms? Or is that not really feasible? The Fuji 50-140 f2.8 is large and expensive, given that it's a 'red badge.'

File: 24_135.jpg (1015 KB, 2100x1400)

1015 KB JPG

33 isn't too bad for fake macro.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-E4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 21:59:31
Exposure Time	1/240 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Brightness	3.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2100
Image Height	1400
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 24_137.jpg (473 KB, 2101x1400)

473 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-E4
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6082
Image Height	4054
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 22:02:20
Exposure Time	1/240 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Brightness	2.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	33.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2101
Image Height	1400
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>4302645
dangerously based

>>4302433
>was first using 35 85 135
>got a 21
>sold the 35
>nowtheresabiggap.arw
>got a 55
>stopped using 21 and 85 altogether
>stuck with using only 55 and 135 to this day
sometimes i wish a had a super wide like 21 or 18 just to see what else kind of compositions i can come up with for my scene but other than that, i can do literally ANYTHING with just 55 and 135

>>4302433
35 prime
70-300 zoom

>>4307239
but you do have a 21

>>4307239
>i can do literally ANYTHING with just 55 and 135>

Totally based.

>>4306949
True especially at the resolutions that matter (256 ppi and better)

File: 2024-03-11 17.35.01.jpg (2.37 MB, 4000x3000)

2.37 MB JPG

>>4289542

File: 20240504_104126.jpg (557 KB, 2252x4000)

557 KB JPG

Any thoughts/feedback?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-S908U
Camera Software	S908USQS4DXD1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.9
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	230 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	2252
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:04 10:41:26
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/4.9
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	DA8XLOD01SM
Image Height	2252
Brightness	10.2 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	3/2000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/4.9
ISO Speed Rating	40
Image Width	4000
Digital Zoom Ratio	37.6
Focal Length	27.20 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4310164
Cool your photo has artistic feel to it like it was the cover of an Edgar Allen Poe book.

File: 20240504_141036.jpg (1.09 MB, 2991x1683)

1.09 MB JPG

Snapped from the passenger seat of a moving vehicle

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	Galaxy S24 Ultra
Equipment Make	samsung
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2991
Image Height	1683
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2024:05:04 14:10:36

>>4306391
both shots are shit but the first one is WAY BETTER than the second one.

second shot with everything in focus is too busy especially in your case where every fucking thing in the image is the same color, same shape and all bunched up together. only an artless retard would prefer the second shot over the first one

>>4307806

Yeah, because blurring the only interesting thing in the scene is "art"

File: IMG_2449.jpg (1.05 MB, 1359x1573)

1.05 MB JPG

>>4306402
For me it’s the Cambo Actus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	144 dpi
Vertical Resolution	144 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1359
Image Height	1573

>>4306391
>>4306392
It's just not a good photo

You should buy the 24-120 f4 vr for landscape photography in busy areas like woodlands, where it's sometimes impossible to zoom with your feet

>>4310621
BASED. Is it worth slapping a dslr on the back of a view camera? The mounting backs are kinda pricey.

If you genuinely care about a subject or a place or a person, I believe your photos will reflect that. If you flit around between supposedly interesting things that you have no knowledge of or familiarity with, your photos stand little chance to be anything more than snapshots.

Let's say you are an alien tasked with photographing a baseball game. What and whom do you focus on? When do you focus on them? When can you expect the people around to react, and how will they react? How will you position yourself to tell the story of the relationship of your subjects? There's a big difference between photographing the batter when he's standing around, versus in the batter's box, versus swinging and missing, versus making contact, versus striking a celebratory pose after he hits a home run, versus the look of frustration when the ball falls just short and the outfielder gets him out. How could you possibly know to expect all of these intricacies if you just show up and gawk?

What's the best time and place to find a particular bird? Where's the best place in the city to look over the cathedral, and how does the differing lighting through the day change its appearance and mood? Where can you expect to find poor people, or rich people, or strange people?

>>4310102
There's little natural contrast in this picture. Literal and abstract contrast is what makes a great picture. Ideally you use the literal contrast to highlight the abstract contrast.

>aesthetic/creative/artistic (or whatever word you want to use) vision, and intent

Get this nonsense out of your head, you are a photographer.

>>4310290 gets it. Find a subject matter that fascinates you and explore it

>>4310461
I kinda like the small slivers of green trees and blue sky, contrasts decently with the city concrete and industrial browns. Technically it does seem oversharpened and is way oversaturated, makes it feel kinda boring and "all the same". yawn

>>4310491
>just be a brainlet like me bro

File: raw0040.jpg (1.47 MB, 1039x1458)

1.47 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	LS-2000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1057
Image Height	1500
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 02:17:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1039
Image Height	1458

File: L1054680.jpg (1.32 MB, 1500x844)

1.32 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Leica Camera AG
Camera Model	M8 Digital Camera
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 02:31:15
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/9.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/9.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1500
Image Height	844
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	00000000000000000000000000003467

File: raw0041.jpg (1.13 MB, 1442x811)

1.13 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	LS-2000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1500
Image Height	999
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:05 02:17:55
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1442
Image Height	811

>>4310293
How are ALL of your negatives just COVERED in shit??????? What are you doing??????

>>4310599
prolly hard water, it tastes like shit too

>>4310606
even iphones give you a view through the lens, but it's a digital one with live editing. enough to replace a lightbulb with the moon, and god knows what else

we should be glad computational photography has not spread through mirrorless beyond very basic, photoshop-tier stuff - except for sony, clear image zoom is AI enhanced images

technology is amazing

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	520
Image Height	420

>>4310583
Get a Pentax 645Z, the lenses are great and cheap. If you want a Leica get an SL or M.

>>4310598
You’ve never used a rangefinder.

journalists use mirrorless cameras with big zoom lenses on them. sounds like fun

>>4310162
>stop posting photos of babies in the thread you stupid fucking nigger
nigger this is a blue board, no one is posting erotic photography here

>>4309976
>anyone can have a kid
>b-but i have to pay women to see their tits

>>4310235

I have a gf I don't have to pay to look at her tits, I'm actually looking at them right now. have a nice day faggot

>>4310268
>I have a gf
again, gf/wives arent going to let you pay prostitutes to take pictures of them.

>>4307784
Most of the time i have to pay them. Remember, the ones you pay are usually the ones that are more experienced. You can start with amateur models, but you might get shit results.
I find most of them through instagram now.

>>4310268
>Hey guys, "Sugar" has a gf...

>>4310249

Wall in Bikkrui Lounge, Orlando Florida.

I was ****very**** drunk when I made those

>>4298895
You did not take this photo.
Egy only photographs random people walking.

>>4299060
You gave them a refund, right?
Or at least delivered the RAWs so they can not live in cringe forever?
It's fine to suck, but giving baked JPEGs only should be a crime.

The more i look at old pictures, the more i think muh image quality is fucking pointless shit in cameras and photography. At least the image quality of today is sufficient. It's just very sophisticated advertisement of the market.

>>4310391
lol no, everyone's gotta start somewhere, fine for what they needed at the time, no point in giving raws to a client
should contribute to the thread and share some of your old work

File: Трамвай эпил..jpg (1.83 MB, 3224x2119)

1.83 MB JPG

>>4287944
Do trams count?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3224
Image Height	2119
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2022:01:13 11:48:23
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3224
Image Height	2119

>>4303394
I posted a tram upthread, so yes.

>>4296556
This one is sick, the colors and composition are absolutely on point, very good job

>>4292201
I really like that

File: 1000001919.jpg (3.93 MB, 5642x3766)

3.93 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 11.4 (Windows)
Photographer	Damien Smith
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	160 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2022:07:04 22:55:55
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Other
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	160.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: libertarian2000s.jpg (2.44 MB, 2223x1474)

2.44 MB JPG

>>4307078

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: politicianportrait2000s.jpg (3.01 MB, 1474x2223)

3.01 MB JPG

>>4307081

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4306601
are you the one who posted the blue building in the train thread

File: Screenshot_20240410_07082(...).jpg (1.5 MB, 1912x1011)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4307323
I am not, no

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Android TP1A.220624.014.N981U1UES6HXC1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1912
Image Height	1011

File: CNV00015.jpg (689 KB, 1840x1232)

689 KB JPG

>>4295767
I have a handful of expired film. Do you have tips on how to best get results? e.g. wrong iso and do I need to let the developer know about it?
Can't remember the details but this is on expired film. I just stuck in in the camera. Kodak something

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.24
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2022:01:13 18:38:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: IMG_20240212_213340.jpg (3.52 MB, 5472x3648)

3.52 MB JPG

>>4310034
I still think most people would rather hire out a helicopter with a $10,000 gimbal that can't get as close to anything, requires permits out the nose, makes a shit ton of noise and wind and cost 2000X more than some guy with a toy airplane

>>4310034
Why do these idiots put the antennae close to their head?

I know a guy who does commercials and shit and he gets brought on set even if they dont need him just in case the crane or the dolly cant quite do the job.

>>4310034
in burgerland? it could've been big if most cities and states didn't basically ban them

>>4310444
What would you prefer? In the ass?

>>4307167
leofoto is a decent chink brand, i wouldn't hesitate

>>4307167
that isnt an arca cube knock off. the cubes as their name implies are cubes. that is one of arca's lesser geared heads

File: 1711773032341929.png (635 KB, 1025x1101)

635 KB PNG

New kino just dropped. Did you ever want to use your tripod as... HIKING STICKS?

>>4307673
Anon monopods are nothing new don’t fall for chinkoid marketing nonsense

>>4299303
Manfrotto MSQ6T, works on other heads than just the ones they list. I have one on a MHXPRO-BHQ2

>>4310110

Use them in my Olympus om1 it’s part of getting that look from that era.
Using my modern Nikon primes on the f100 produces something that looks halfway between film and digital.
I much prefer film with these older style lenses.

>>4310328
No, that's your mother.

>>4310159
Not particularly, but Zeiss has a certain niche, and a lens doesn't have to be Zeiss-like to be good

File: MDR_1606-edit-5-4.jpg (972 KB, 1920x1536)

972 KB JPG

>>4310232
Yes, but they'll adapt rather easily to modern mirrorless (DSLRs are S.O.L. though, since the back element gets in the mirror's way). The Takumar 50s are also known for their heavy flaring when wide open. Pic related is f/1.4.

File: MDR_1571-edit-4-3.jpg (975 KB, 1920x1440)

975 KB JPG

>>4310434
This is probably a better example.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties: