File: solarografia_2.jpg (152 KB, 1280x659)

152 KB JPG

>>4313685
Here's the one taken with the left one.

Pictures were digitized with a regular DSLR with two lights pointing the photo paper in a 45 degree angle. Exposure checked with a gray paper beforehand.

>>4313347
>>4313690
How long did you expose these for? Judging by the sun rings I'd guess around 3-4 weeks, right? Also, did you develop them or just scanned them as they are?

>>4313334
I wonder where did those white marks come from

>>4313704
About three weeks is correct, since the exposing time was tied to the duration of the course. I scanned them as they were, no need to develop solarographs.

File: image.jpg (264 KB, 2048x1756)

264 KB JPG

>>4313705
I know some people do develop solargraphs but if I recall correctly that's if you just use one of those semi-diy pinhole boxes for 20-30 seconds of exposure.

>>4313721
Film photography is chemistry

File: 1_57e35474-cdd2-4281-b5bf(...).jpg (176 KB, 713x713)

176 KB JPG

gimmicks like this exist now.
Filters and anamorphic lenses to bolt onto your phone to make them look less like ass. They're good fun to play with.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	GIMP 2.10.34
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	25 dpi
Vertical Resolution	25 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:14 14:51:30
Image Width	713
Image Height	713

>>4308076
The only non-nigger manufacturer you're talking about are Xperia phones with their pro camera apps. They even have a two-stage button where a half-press triggers auto-focus (just like a real camera!). Otherwise, you can map the volume buttons but still no AF half-press.

>>4308104
post-processing (typically mitigated by shooting in RAW) and cancerous ergonomics. You have most of the controls available to you on most camera apps these days but you have to use a touchscreen to adjust anything at all.
Also, you look like a sad faggot taking creepshots when using a phone.

>>4312132
>iPhone photo
>Android UI visible
What

imo, either use your phone or go at least aps-cope/cuck/crippled/cringe/castrated, no point in going below that if you want kinda serious shots

>>4313597
baste

i left the hood on my one lens that came with one. it's relatively small so i don't mind it too much. my other lenses lack hoods, which doesn't matter most of the time. only when it rains do i wish i had a hood

Only if I know I'm going to be shooting with the sun up high. Otherwise, no.

>>4313525
I use them on most of my lenses.
Incidentally, the only (two) lenses I've dropped didn't have hoods on them and probably would have been fine if they did.

>>4313525
>Does anyone even use these things?
I always use lens hoods. get a big enough bag and you won't have to reverse them for storage.

File: wermz.jpg (219 KB, 846x567)

219 KB JPG

>>4313526
naw bro it happens in my 2018 release of camera raw as well so its not just one release

>>4311154
pyw

>>4312683
There still is.
Sooc jpeg: soft, zombie colors
Processing foolji raws in any program: a wait, for sure. Why do they take so much longer to load?

>>4310716
Fuji simply because they suck. Its a rare case where there is a such thing as bad gear and a pricy camera actually has worse IQ - such things have been unknown since the death of the canon DSLR.

Fujifags seethe hard about nice gear too, like they think good image quality is a bad thing and you shouldnt even have the option. They are all aged 20-30 and do not know that most film is significantly higher resolutiom than an xt5 because all they ever saw was walmart 4x6s

>>4310716
fuji for sure
looking at brands in terms of general "why would I not use them" points, can think of the most for fuji, but i can also think of a lot of niche "why would I use them" points
they're really only ideal for a very specific set of niche preferences, and sub-optimal for most
other brands feel like their better general purpose options, or have 1-2 clear usage cases
the mass normie popularity (and inventory issues) probably gives a sour grape feel to people who might otherwise be ideal users, similar to leica
definitely seems to inspire the most hate here for sure, its just a shame people cant be honest about the faults without exaggerating or relying on more dubious criticisms

pretty crazy how much the sentiments have changed though, they used to be seemingly universally liked, even here
still one of my favorite brands to use though, but most people are better off looking elsewhere

>>4310824
very cool and well-framed photo anon. I like that every side of the house is captured with something around it (grass, trees or sky) to frame it. you could warm up the white balance a little though to remove the banding around the edges of the tree and the roofline. yeah, I had another look. the white balance is definitely too cold. oh yeah, I also remembered that you should have moved left (maintaining the same distance from the house) to simultaneously elongate the horizontal dimensions of the house and remove the awkward bit of road in the bottom right. still though, you’ve done well to identify this composition anon. well done.

>>4308074
without a word of advice
you should be ashamed of yourself anon.
>inb4 your advice is shit
>inb4 kill yourself
>after <<don’t you have your own website ken?>>
I’m trying something out of the ordinary. if you believe ken’s style (which I’ve never viewed in detail) is so beneath you, do something better than him or shut up. one picture is worth a thousand words (and I have to reiterate this on /p/, the photography board of all places).

>>4313645
>cryingbaby.jpg

>>4313645
Never posting here again was your advice.

>>4310657
Don't feed dogs with edibles anon.

>>4312912
Judging by the replies he was wrong and got btfo hard.

File: GALAXY-S4-zoom-8.jpg (78 KB, 872x586)

78 KB JPG

>>4313500

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	andoWKS15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:06:11 09:07:07
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	872
Image Height	586

File: Yongnuo-YN455-Micro-Four-(...).jpg (78 KB, 651x442)

78 KB JPG

>>4313500
or what about real camera with phone? (even has built-in selfie camera)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	651
Image Height	442

>>4313505
Kinda cool
>>4313506
That means I always have to carry my camera

>>4312554
>commodified hobbies
I think I've seen that in a Youtube video essay

>>4310034
Why do these idiots put the antennae close to their head?

I know a guy who does commercials and shit and he gets brought on set even if they dont need him just in case the crane or the dolly cant quite do the job.

>>4310034
in burgerland? it could've been big if most cities and states didn't basically ban them

>>4310444
What would you prefer? In the ass?

>>4310034
Funnily enough I was thinking the same thing. It looks fun to do and I love high speeds. Are there any good resources for learning how to get good at it? Is there a good beginner drone that's affordable?

>>4313479
based good riddance
canon is the walmart camera

>>4313528
your mom is the walmart woman

canon sent a hitman to cover up allegations of the r1 being delayed yet again

>>4313479
She probably worked for boeing

My only sadness is that it makes it harder to know when preorders will open. The R5 II will likely be sold out for months, so preordering immediately is a must.

>>4313330
If you're foreign, shoot without a warning, call me paparazzi.

>>4313395
That has potential to be a great bar. Work it out and put it on a moonman rap

>>4313415
It's part of a Mr. Bond original: "Supa Nazi".
Catchy as hell.

>>4312896
Use at least 50mm lens (around 80mm is best) or you'll look like shit. If shooting with a phone, zoom in 2-3x since the normal lens is usually equivalent to 24 to 35mm range.
If you don't have lights, do it if a cloudy day to get diffuse light. Sit or stand dead on towards light source (eg. window). Try around noon. Don't even think about shooting with artificial lights that are not studio lights or flashes (like household bulbs, especially CFLs or LEDs), it will look like shit.
Or just don't be a cheap shit and pay $15 to a teenager at CVS to have it done semi-completely.

How is this such a burning question that warrants so much debate? Find a white or very light wall. Try to position a light source so that there isn’t a big shadow behind you.
Take a selfie.
If you need to make changes to dimensions or erase shadow or lighten up the wall to white, most basic photo editing software can do this easy.
I haven’t done a US passport renewal yet, but most countries have switched or have digital forms with photo upload options, so you don’t even need to special print the photos anymore.

>>4301132
Now THAT'S a Texas car. Got a built-in grill XD

File: DSC08416.jpg (1.98 MB, 2048x1365)

1.98 MB JPG

I haven't seen dickbutt in years and yet here it was today staring me in the face from a Supra engine bay.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:11 20:28:42
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	5000
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Brightness	2.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: DSC00209.jpg (492 KB, 1920x1080)

492 KB JPG

new to photography and this was the first "decent" one to me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-W55
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2007:04:11 13:31:24
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	9.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4301116
idk, this is funny to me. looks like the foreground car is scared and the background car is lurking.

File: DSC09217.jpg (1.56 MB, 2048x1365)

1.56 MB JPG

yab

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6700
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	360 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:12 16:12:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	7.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	240.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4306644
I think it's a light breeze fucking up OPs stabilization

>>4307518
This, it looks blurry, and some parts are over-sharpened.

>>4306644
I can tell you definitively that this is a shit image, but whether that's due to "ai slop" in your phone or just general overbaking denoising+sharpening applied I can't say.

The ridiculous banding is what jumps out and screams "shit image, shit shit shit, bad bad!" but yes the "fine details" (there are none) are also shit here.
I don't know what to say other than you must shoot RAW, and avoid proprietary "special"RAW formats and stick with regular RAWs.

>>4309798
The fact he managed to line up the eyepiece and phones camera is mildly impressive IMO. Go try it sometime and see how quickly you loose your shit...

File: 612ER6OZ2bL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (96 KB, 1192x1369)

96 KB JPG

Old Used DSLR + Picrel (T-Ring)

File: P1010732-Edit.jpg (4.48 MB, 3968x2232)

4.48 MB JPG

>>4313448
Berlin skyline.
A lot of the detail was destroyed by the fake Ilford XP2. I think if my camera had more than 12mp it would have worked better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 20:08:37
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: P1080529-Edit.jpg (3.87 MB, 3648x2736)

3.87 MB JPG

>>4313449
This is supposed to be Portra 400.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 22:50:35
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: P1080550-Edit.jpg (3.36 MB, 3648x2736)

3.36 MB JPG

>>4313451
Cat I met while on a bikeride.
Fake portra 400.
This'll be the last photo I share.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:13 22:50:35
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>4313452
>>4313451
Looks nothing like portra, more like “fujifilm digital superia x-tra 800”

File: P1080528-Edit-4.jpg (4.4 MB, 2736x3648)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4313454
Here's a test with "portra 400" without any of the other processing I do in lightroom.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:14 01:19:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	7.90 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: img016.jpg (1.15 MB, 2858x1896)

1.15 MB JPG

another couple that aren't quite as good but are ok. shot on the minolta p&s as well

File: img017.jpg (1.32 MB, 2844x1884)

1.32 MB JPG

arnr

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2022:05:19 10:41:46
Color Space Information	sRGB

imgur link: https://imgur.com/a/6jgzhCw

>>4313213
Not much going on
>>4313214
Frustrating composition (cutoff chair and lady, random thing in top left)
>>4313215
Pretty nice. Maybe too much going on, I might've tried to get the building out of the composition but I like this one.

Keep it up.

>>4313228
life is tumblr

>>4313289
>film
Yea no one is paying $50 for a bunch of light leaked out of focus crap sorry. My GRIIIX can upload right to my phone for a quick tweak in LR Mobile and post. The workflow and IQ is amazing for such a small camera that can fit right in my pocket. Have fun waiting on your "scans" to then edit for 2 hours each haha.

>>4306499
>>4306500
>>4306502
>>4306503
Is this bait? This doesn't look like film

>>4313352
film simulators are for retards who son't shoot film and never have or never got drum scans or scanned themselves with good equipment
essentially these are FroPack presets (lol) built into some meme digicams and the retards eat it up

>>4313295
35mm film has 2-3 times the resolution of a ricoh gr and 2-3 more stops of dynamic range

The ricoh gr is stuck in the days when digital wasnt just less soulful - it was lower quality and “solid state” meant “choppy, harsh computery crap” instead of “tolerable but boring and emotionless simulation”.

>>4313386
kiddos born in the early 2000s like awful digital photography because it reminds them of their childhood (back in 2012) and nothing else

if you were born before or after that it sucks and if you were born after that please leave. 12 year olds not wanted here.

>>4313074
1/8000 shutter speed
is
1/14 shutter speed
on nikon z7
each row collects light for 1/8000th of a second
but it takes 1/14th second to sample top row to bottom row
so the overall process, of rolling shutter, makes it a 1/14th shutter speed

you need mechanical shutter to compensate
or CCD
or a nu-global shutter CMOS

cameras have been cucked unnecessarily for so long
rolling shutter is ridiculous

>>4313095
>The phone can get something in focus without a 1 second delay
lol no

>>4313315
>You need mechanical shutter
Well then, problem fucking solved.

Now what's the point of paying out the ass for a global shutter sony when
1: It has the dynamic range of a micro four thirds camera, so bad sony has clear noise reduction cooked into their raws to make the SNR *LOOK* like its only as bad as APS-C (to be fair they are not the only one, canon does a similar thing with... literally every EOS R, usually at low ISOs but its every ISO on the R3, olympus apparently forces color noise reduction in raw and denoising and moire reduction is normally a baked in part of demosaicing xtrans)
2: RED ALREADY HAS AN APS-C GLOBAL SHUTTER SENSOR WITH SEVERAL STOPS MORE DYNAMIC RANGE THAN THE BEST POSSIBLE FULL FRAME CAMERA YOU CAN BUY, FOR THE SAME PRICE, AND IT SHOOTS 16 BIT RAW (IS JAPAN EVEN FUCKING TRYING?)
(hot takes ahead, some plane spotting autist might be mad, and some gearfag autist whose ego is based on racking up debt to buy an R3 might be madder)
3: The readout of a mechanical shutter, or a MS-speed eshutter (Z8, R3) is already excessively fast for anything but specific motorsports, which is honestly a boring, soulless non-artistic waste of time of no more value than blurry phone snaps taken of the exact same thing and you should feel bad for being enough of an autistic bugman to want to photograph it with a $6000 camera.
4: Anything over 10FPS is of 0 use for anything but PROFESSIONAL sports photography where things like the very moment a golf club hits a ball are valuable. Again this is a soulless endeavor. it is impossible for it to be art. you should feel bad for wanting to photograph this. This is the domain of engineers playing with high speed cameras that they would normally use for testing and research making an appearance on an informational youtube video/mythbusters or some shit, not "REAL" photographers (artists). Perhaps 12fps, but much faster and we're getting into the territory where strobes recycle times can't keep up.

File: -1x-1.jpg (398 KB, 2000x1334)

398 KB JPG

>>4313319
>RED ALREADY HAS
*Nikon already has

RED just asked for the sensor, towejazz designed and built it. Then Nikon asked for RED and everything they had, including their supplier contracts with towerjazz.

kekekeke

>>4313319
muh mechanical simplicity
muh indestructible electronics