pictures from a recent trip[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareCapture One WindowsImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Width2048Image Height1536
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
>>4306718careful now Chuck Noland
>>4306716I went to Tenerife, didn't see many beaches but hiked up the highest peak in Spain.
bump I'm not letting a photo thread be pushed off by a gear thread
cool thread, anon. thanks for sharing.
Ansel Adams used to tilt the plate is his cameras in order to get his entire photo in focus at once, regardless of the depth of field. Now we all just go to the highest f stop value possible and shoot for the best. Alternatively some with set up with a tripod, and take 10 photos of the same exact scene with different focus points, and blend them all into one picture in photoshop. Others hate the concept and prefer a visual reference to the depth of field with an area clearly in focus and an area that is clearly not. This then begs the question, is focus better long range or up close?I played around with the concept a bit. I took two pictures, one just as far back as possible, and then another on the close foreground. I did this trying to see which style I liked better. Personally I like the foreground in focus, but the other person I asked preferred the shot with the background in focus. so what do you guys think? do you have a preference? Or do you like the Incel Adams "everything in focus" approach?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D610Camera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern850Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:21 14:20:47Exposure Time1/4000 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/4.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeSpotLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmComment452942Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeLandscapeGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4310643I am running canon mirrorless bodies on the back with mamiya medium format lenses….. Although I really want to grab a Fuji film GFX, but that multiplies the cost a lot…..using the setup for stop motion and Timelapse in my studio. Yeah the Cambo stuff is $$$.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeAppleCamera ModeliPhone 11 Pro MaxCamera Software16.6.1Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2023:11:02 23:08:36Exposure Time1/58 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Brightness1.1 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.25 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width2462Image Height3668Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306402https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/using-a-large-format-camera-to-make-digital-photographsSearching for these 3D printed files. I imagine they are the authors home brew. Would be cool to adapt my next technical camera.
>>4310951here is the one from the BH blog post.https://standardcameras.com/products/the-standard-4x5-2-0here's some others:https://www.printables.com/search/models?q=4x5%20camerahttps://thangs.com/search/4x5%20camera?scope=all&view=grid
>>4310622Yeah I know it’s bad. I’m just fucking around with foreground/background blur from extreme distance differences and its impact on the outcome of the photo. Neither one of these are going to be printed or published. It’s just to start a discussion of what the role of a foreground should be. A frame for the background? What if it’s the subject instead? Or is anale Adams the best answer of “fuck it everything is in focus” Which aesthetic choice do you like better? Which do you use? Can you provide examples with pictures you’ve taken?
>>4307535>Isn't this simply remarkable?nah
I have an old jpeg thats corrupted that im trying to open. The last 6 apps i've tried display the pic, but either output it as a tiny thumbnail, or heavily watermark the image to the point of ruining it. Does anyone know of an app that's free that is actually free to fix busted jpegs? Thanks, anons
>>4304711gimp?>open image>click save as
>>4306409You know nothing.When a JPEG image is corrupt, no application will open it. You need special software to repair the file as it is a heavily compressed format reliant on decompression to deliver the pixels. If something in the chain breaks, the file is "bricked" from normal programs point of view, but recovery software can detect where errors rise and you can replace bad data to fix the problems.A few bad bits can brick a JPEG. Fixing those bits will fix the file, you might lose some 8x8 blocks but the rest can be fine. GIMP won't help with this. GIMP is what you'd use after repair to then edit out the missing blocks to fill in the missing pixels.
>>4310786so far he knows more than you since he's actually recommended software that is free of charge and by your own admission is able to fix busted jpegs
>>4304301Try photorec. It might not be able to fix it but it will definitely be able to find a copy of the file within the disk that was temporarily created while moving or editing or viewing since all the software creates temp versions of files while accessing it. Chances are that at least one of the recovered copies might not be damaged
>>4310787I know English is not your first language, but consider using a translator.GIMP does not fix busted JPEGsGIMPO NO EL FIXO LA JPEGGOS PUTA MADREGIMP won't even open a busted JPEG. It just gives you an error.
I've been shooting on a Canon 5DIV for the past few years. My shutter has been sticking and instead of sending it back, figure it's time to upgrade. Before this I was a Nikon shooter with the D700/D750/D800 and really liked it but switched to Canon mainly due to the f1.2 lenses and much better customer service in my country.I rented an R5 and R6II and they were nice enough with the pro zooms and the 50 1.2 but after trying the Z8 and the small 1.8 primes, I really was reminded of what I missed about Nikon. AF was better, the camera bodies felt better and more "rugged", DR was better but in fairness comparing to a previous gen Canon R5. One thing I hated though was how hyuge the Nikon 50 1.2 was- and that's my go-to lens in any system.Is Nikon doing better now as a company in listening to their customers than they did during the DSLR days? I think I read they were overtaken by Snoy so it must be a kick to the nuts to be #3 now.
>>4299475my thoughts are that you should replace that 5D Mk 4 shutter[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareVer.2.01Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern848Focal Length (35mm Equiv)52 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:05:01 14:16:58Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length35.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1936Image Height1296RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownISO Speed Used100Color ModeCOLORImage QualityNORMALWhite BalanceAUTOImage SharpeningAUTOFocus ModeAF-CFlash SettingNORMALFlash Compensation0.0 EVISO Speed Requested100Flash Bracket Compensation0.0 EVAE Bracket Compensation0.0 EVTone CompensationAUTOLens TypeNikon D SeriesLens Range35.0 mm; f/1.8Auto FocusCenterShooting/Bracketing ModeSingle Frame/OffColor ModeMODE1Lighting TypeNATURALNoise ReductionOFFCamera Actuations6139Image OptimizationNORMALSaturation 2AUTO
>>4305599Every time I read Niggor I chuckle and makes my day just a bit better, and this one was good. Thank you anon, godspeed to you and your big black Niggor lens collection
>>4305100worked photo retail for about a decade, and from that perspective, sony had by far the best store support for my region (most sponsored events & workshops, rep visits, relatively few supply issues), greatest spif / commission paid of any of the brands, greatest employee purchase programs / discountsa lot of employees switched over around the a7II/III generations and never looked back, and the incentives to push sony are just too good
>>4305599>NIGGORKek. I want to change my lens font to this so I get a chuckle every time I look down at it.
>>4299475Nikon Electronic Format (NEF) supports lossy compression and some of their cameras have only supported that lossy output.
Pentax 645n editionPrevious thread>>4307062/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4310875> What's your deepest regret in film?1. Didn’t save first negatives2. Wasted too much time/shots shooting color on the begging of my film journey 3. Wasted film with shit cameras (p&s, soviet garbage, no metering manual ones)
And here it is fellas! My first contact print of a wet plate colloidion negative I took on glass. Pretty little thing. The small shack is so crispy sharp in person. The fine detail really makes it stand out.The nikkor T ED 720mm lens is really quite nice, but a major pain to work with. I had to use 2 tripods to support my camera in the wind for my 5 second exposure.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height1800Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:06 11:09:35Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height1800Brightness8.7 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time13/10000 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating16Image Width4000Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4309008new bread >>4310960>>4310960>>4310960>>4310960
>>4310853idk, bellows focus, mirror lockup, leaf shutter and rotating back were both pretty useful for that photo>>4310851I think it was the 180mm, it's my favohrite lense for the camera of the 5 or so I have
>>4310892>1:16Too dim
You guys have been paying your Lightroom and photoshop subscription right?Adobe needs somebody to pay for their skip the photoshoot marketing campaign.Literally who thinks this stuff up?
>>4310795probably the same people that think regional costumes are good marketing
I make images for a living. Happy to answer any questions.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON Z 9Camera SoftwareCapture One 15 MacintoshSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/6.3Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/6.3Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length24.00 mmImage Width2000Image Height1333RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4309020Why was I so excited to buy my first camera but now it's here I never want to use it?
>>4309020why would you make a whole thread for yourself and then not share photos?at least have the decency to not be a nophoto
>>4310460Multi purpose neck strap.
>>4310520>Minolta HRTHow fitting.
>>4310514Because a camera on its own is not exciting, it’s all about what you can use it for. What did you want to photograph, what inspired you to buy the problem? If there’s no answer to that, found the problem.
>>4310146>>4310148That and I also doubt that he realises at all what is happening here. I am quite certain now that ol' zacherino is legally retarded. He just doesn't know better. It's not a choice that he ignores all and every single hint or justified critique, but he is simply unable to process it and to reflect it on himself just for a second. A tragic figure, but also fascinating. Reminds me a bit of the Drachenlord. The internet should never have opened up for normies.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon PowerShot G5 X Mark IIImage-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height1620Image Created2024:05:03 00:14:57Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiISO Speed Rating500Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityF-Numberf/4.5Exposure Time1/60 secFocal Length8.80 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModePatternScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias-0.7 EVImage Height1080White BalanceAutoImage Width1620Exposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/4.6Color Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormal
>>4310263Stick around and wait til you see some more of his threads. He’s basically our resident schizo
>>4310298Cool are we gonna sit around and eat popcorn?
>>4310300Yes, watching you continue to make an absolute fool out of yourself.
>>4310358Okay then, cool.
It's not my fault I appreciate the comfort of men in the eveningThey make me feel secure, loved, cared for.
Is it truly possible to learn to have aesthetic/creative/artistic (or whatever word you want to use) vision, and intent with your photos? I’ve been taking snapshits sporadically for the better part of 20 years now (pops game me an ae1 in middle school), but I don’t think I’ve ever taken any really great pictures. >picrel, Ken Rockwell sliders applied to mediocre snapshitMy pictures seem to be more, just what I see, essentially just capturing the world as it exists with little meaning or really interest I’d say. Even calling it documentary would be too generous, it’s more cataloguing if anything. Can one break out of this box? Or is creativity like other inborn traits where you can train and practice but there’s a limit to how much you can do with what you’re born with? (/fit/ sisters can relate). I know probably it isn’t the best place to discuss since we’re snapshitters amongst snapshitters here, but surely this isn’t as good as it’ll ever get, right?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeSONYCamera ModelILCE-7M2Camera SoftwareILCE-7M2 v4.00Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)200 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2018:08:14 18:44:39Exposure Time1/500 secF-Numberf/2.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Brightness8.3 EVExposure Bias0.7 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length200.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3812Image Height3812Exposure ModeAuto BracketWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormal
If you genuinely care about a subject or a place or a person, I believe your photos will reflect that. If you flit around between supposedly interesting things that you have no knowledge of or familiarity with, your photos stand little chance to be anything more than snapshots. Let's say you are an alien tasked with photographing a baseball game. What and whom do you focus on? When do you focus on them? When can you expect the people around to react, and how will they react? How will you position yourself to tell the story of the relationship of your subjects? There's a big difference between photographing the batter when he's standing around, versus in the batter's box, versus swinging and missing, versus making contact, versus striking a celebratory pose after he hits a home run, versus the look of frustration when the ball falls just short and the outfielder gets him out. How could you possibly know to expect all of these intricacies if you just show up and gawk?What's the best time and place to find a particular bird? Where's the best place in the city to look over the cathedral, and how does the differing lighting through the day change its appearance and mood? Where can you expect to find poor people, or rich people, or strange people?
>>4310102There's little natural contrast in this picture. Literal and abstract contrast is what makes a great picture. Ideally you use the literal contrast to highlight the abstract contrast.
>aesthetic/creative/artistic (or whatever word you want to use) vision, and intent Get this nonsense out of your head, you are a photographer. >>4310290 gets it. Find a subject matter that fascinates you and explore it
>>4310461I kinda like the small slivers of green trees and blue sky, contrasts decently with the city concrete and industrial browns. Technically it does seem oversharpened and is way oversaturated, makes it feel kinda boring and "all the same". yawn
>>4310491>just be a brainlet like me bro
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
I'm going to be purchasing a Leica M6 at some point this year.Between the voigtlander 35mm f1.4 nokton and the 35mm f2 ultron which do you Anons recommend?I wouldn't mind the extra light on the nokton, but pic related is shot wide open on it and honestly looks rather ugly. The lens coma is especially pushing me towards the ultron.
>>4311129what the fuck is that
>>4311129i have the nokton but i rarely shoot it wide open. pic related was around f2 i think. never tried the ultron, but that seems more your speed if you don't like messy images
>>4311428Shit that actually looks pretty nice. I guess the worst of the flaws in the design disappear when stopped down. I like somewhat messy images, but the example I posted previously just feels bad, not even interesting. I have seen quite a lot of nice images with the lens wide open as well however.
>>4311584perhaps, but having to stop down in the dark somewhat negates the advantage of the bigger max aperture. not to mention how hard it would be to hit focus at 1.4 in the dark. here's another with the nokton >>4304154. don't remember what f stop but i think you just have to watch out for highlights in the corners on this lens. coma like in the street corner pic you posted doesn't bother me however. the nokton (single coated) is my only m lens rn and i chose it specifically because i wanted the flaws and flares.
ITT: previous work from more than 10 years ago that you shotI'm doing a huge data migration and have had a second look at all of my early stuff when I had a Digital Rebel. I'll post stuff as I get through it and see it. This particular one is 2011.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTiCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)PhotographerunknownMaximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:27 22:09:36Exposure Time1/60 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4310249Wall in Bikkrui Lounge, Orlando Florida.I was ****very**** drunk when I made those
>>4298895You did not take this photo.Egy only photographs random people walking.
>>4299060You gave them a refund, right?Or at least delivered the RAWs so they can not live in cringe forever?It's fine to suck, but giving baked JPEGs only should be a crime.
The more i look at old pictures, the more i think muh image quality is fucking pointless shit in cameras and photography. At least the image quality of today is sufficient. It's just very sophisticated advertisement of the market.
>>4310391lol no, everyone's gotta start somewhere, fine for what they needed at the time, no point in giving raws to a clientshould contribute to the thread and share some of your old work
post photos you've taken on expired filmpicrel is 1000iso 3m colorslide that expired in 1984[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3119Image Height2075
>>4307078[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4307081[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiColor Space InformationsRGB
>>4306601are you the one who posted the blue building in the train thread
>>4307323I am not, no[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid TP1A.220624.014.N981U1UES6HXC1Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1912Image Height1011
>>4295767I have a handful of expired film. Do you have tips on how to best get results? e.g. wrong iso and do I need to let the developer know about it? Can't remember the details but this is on expired film. I just stuck in in the camera. Kodak something[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.Camera ModelSP-3000Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.10.24Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2022:01:13 18:38:21Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1840Image Height1232
Have you all actually tried these lenses? They're pretty cool.
>>4310110Use them in my Olympus om1 it’s part of getting that look from that era.Using my modern Nikon primes on the f100 produces something that looks halfway between film and digital.I much prefer film with these older style lenses.
>>4310328No, that's your mother.
>>4310159Not particularly, but Zeiss has a certain niche, and a lens doesn't have to be Zeiss-like to be good
>>4310232Yes, but they'll adapt rather easily to modern mirrorless (DSLRs are S.O.L. though, since the back element gets in the mirror's way). The Takumar 50s are also known for their heavy flaring when wide open. Pic related is f/1.4.
>>4310434This is probably a better example.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
>pic relatedGot it in 2004 for my birthday. Dad spent $400 on this sucker plus the 256-512MB memory cards. It was awesome with the 4x optical zoom and fit in the back seat compartment of my motorcycle so I took it everywhere and got some great pictures. Sensor died not even three years later so my only complaint. I’ll have to grab a few shots from my computer later, but looking back at some of the pics I’m still impressed with the quality of this little guy. They sometimes have that “DSLR” look instead of the processed iPhone camera look.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1068Image Height801Scene Capture TypeStandard
this little guy[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T1iCamera SoftwarePaintShop Pro 16.00Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1486Image Height1820Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2017:01:02 15:41:18Color Space InformationsRGBImage Width1486Image Height1820Exposure Time1/160 secF-Numberf/5.6Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/5.7Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
The first digital camera i actually bought myself was my Canon T3, that i still use.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:
I borrowed my brother's and my dad's powershot camera. Afterwards I had a Flip camera passed down to me that I sold. I experimented with super 8 not able to get an image that my parents donated. On my 18th birthday I got a T2i and from then on I've been using it for 11 years and I'm 29.
KODAK EASYSHARE CX6200 DIGITAL CAMERASurprised the quality was way better than upscaled vga webcam stuff for only 50 euros.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeEASTMAN KODAK COMPANYCamera ModelKODAK EASYSHARE CX6200 DIGITAL CAMERACamera SoftwareVersion 1.0100Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.5Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution230 dpiVertical Resolution230 dpiExposure Time657/125000 secF-Numberf/4.5Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/4.5Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.99 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1632Image Height1232Exposure Index100RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
who jamcam?
How did they get blown the F out by Nikon off all people?>artemis mission back to the moon >using Nikon Z9 instead of glorious German 100mp[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution71 dpiVertical Resolution71 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width750Image Height750Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306253ai live editing evf is possible, or atleast camera can recognize scene and take a picture
>>4304863>mogged by iPhone lenslmao
>>4309859It's not possible with camera processors so shit they struggle to do HDR and panorama alignment 50% as well as right clicking in capture one
>>4304860>artemis mission back to the moonThere is no easy way for me to tell you this so I'll make it short and straight to the point.Space is fakeNukes are a hoaxEvolution is a lieEarth is flatDinosaurs never existed.
>>4309881Based as heck.
