Why is the T-90M so shit?
nice tank you got there
>>61655358Tanks a lot!
>>61655358his skin is reverting to its true color
>>61655358>American tanks having a layer of soot instead of being a pile of shredded metalImpressiev.
Rate, Post, LARP, Let's see em
Let's say you had to pick between a lever action in .357 or .30-30 to survive the apocalypse, what model would you get and which caliber?You also get an optic of your choice, if desired.
>>61623610Based victory chad
>>61654487.357 ammo might be a little easier to find. I'd go with that.If I get a free stonkpile of ammo too then 30 30
>>61654487When the fuck did rossi's get to be $800+? Last time I was looking at lever guns was pre covid and a rossi was like $350. A 336 was around $500. Prices have doubled or more. Crazy
20” chads where you at
Tried and True, Old Friend EditionPost Wood (Furniture)Love Your WoodPolish Your WoodAnime bad, Robots gudThread's Theme -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDfOqIJ6Oc0As Always; No Rules, look at me. I'm Captain Now.Previously, On \BRG\: >>61588165
>>61653665They used to sell this thin one on HK parts that made it a push left to right paddle, but I don’t see them anymore.
>>61654649Give the BRG Chads a hint for easy help>price range (in football fields)>usage (like DMR, BR...)Im always recommending the Savage MSR 10 Hunter because I dont know better, so much about that :) It got a 5R barrel and adj. gas block and a medium/light profile whichis kind of neat
>>61654738>Savage MSR 10 HunterThey quit making that ~2 years ago.
…So what the hell was in them?
>>61650669Haven't seen any negative feedback about them even though they're semi-new on the market. But really, they're just PTR 91s built on portuguese parts kits, built by PTR themselves. New receivers, new trunnions, new barrels, etc. Furniture and some finishing looks a little rough from the pictures I've seen but still serviceable
How difficult would this be, anywaysit's not like you are making a gun, just a body kit
>>61655096>non-viable>leave access hole for gas port>extend brass chuteyou were dropped a lot as a child, huh?
>>61654897Give me a Kel-Tec RFB, half a year and 100 000 USD, and I will give you back an M392 DMR bodykit and all the engineering drawings and CAD models required to produce it commercially.
>>61655698Leaving some kind of access hole for the gas regulator that's large enough to facilitate inserting a cartridge and rotating it is probably feasible, though it would look retarded. But nigger, you want to double the length of the ejection chute, and then what, put a bend in it so that it clears the giant "front sight post"? Have you ever shot one of these things before? Their ejection is already extremely unreliable before you double the length of the conga line of brass and make it take a corner. If you wanted to body kit a bullpup, this is the wrong one to use. At least use one that ejects the same way as the gun you're copying. Practically every other bullpup on the market uses a standard side ejection port.
>>61654897Learn CAD, buy a 3D scanner and a 3D printer and you're good.
>>61654947>For example, your front sight is going to have to be welded, peened or otherwise mechanically attached to your barrel. Are you willing to pay a gunsmith to do that?Unironically it doesn't. You can, 100% just have that mounted to the "body kit." It wouldn't really hold zero, yes, but it doesn't really need to. Since, you know, the optic is going to be doing the aiming job and a front site doesn't matter without a rear site anyway.
Burgers what the fuck, is this true? What do you do with them all?!
>>61629315There's a few that I kind of cycle through for concealed carry. There's a few I hunt with. Most I just enjoy shooting, although some of them I haven't taken shooting for a few years.
>>61654500Quires los dos?
>>61648802>Had I still lived in europe it might have been a fucking gay coatwell, at least you people are better at dressing somewhat nicely
>>61629325Chances are we saved your ass from Hitler after you rolled over and surrendered.
All you eurotrash are typing in English right now lol
if you don't have thermals, you are so far below the power curve you should forgo all weapons/tactical gears to not appear as a threat to someone with thermals
>>61655493>ahemgg
>>61655641Can still spot your head from 800m away
>>61655728>zipper hoodiecheckmate
>>61655493If you have thermals, you just wasted $10K on a larp that will never come to fruition in real life. Enough with your spec-ops fantasies, faggot.
Any oldfags got the Carl Carwindows greentext?
Was it a MCX?Old >>61650294
>>61656128That's about what the sales are running, good call. If that extra 150 will improve my quality of life I'll get a better look at it. They advertise "gentle scratches on lower receiver" but we'll see. Thanks for the tip.
>>61652982i called eotech to ask what the torque specs are for the hood and the guy didn't even know and was hesitant to tell menot saying anything about eotech, but that's how stupid the userbase of cops and zogniggers is, not surprising desu but still amazing that they manage to do anything at all when they don't even know how to operate screwdrivers
>>61653792>>heavy>arhello weakling
>>61656416>torque specs are for the hoodyou dont need toque specs to tighten the hood, dork
>>61653482>sailol this optic was such a piece of shit. I had one where the ilumination suddenly died one night when I was out hunting, never could get it to work again. at least the customer service dude was nice and refunded me full price>meanwhile me and 3 buddies have all been using razor 1-6s for years with zero issues
So I had a random thought. With normal frag grenade it's pretty obvious how they work you just put some nitride based explosive and fuse together, but I have no idea how flashbang work and when I tried to google it I just got the really wage destription that it produces flash and high decibel sound to stun the enemy which was is basic knowladge to begin with. So obviously I am not gonna type into google how to make flashbang to get better description of the percentige of chemicals used and schematics of the casing because that would instantly put me on multiple watchlists. So I've been wondering if any of you have some answers?
>>61652280Doesn't matter
>>61652221>automatic surveillance
>>61654092>he doesn't recognize the automatic vs automated distinctionMidwits go home /k/ is a philosophy majors board.
>>61652330>stun someone.It's a bang and a bright light, it's not like in the video games.
>>61652476kekit's absolutely not just another boom. buy one. try it. better yet, toss it into a friend's truck or into the bathroom at them. more fun, and you'll still feel it outside the door.
hello anons. wich fighter jet is the bestest and more high tech and powerful? The american F-35 Lightning II or the russian Suhoi Su-35?
>>61655564an F35 with the right missiles can shoot a target that is directly behind it at point blank range no fucking way is some POS sukhoi going to beat it in a dogfight
>>61655615Correct. That was precisely my point. Also, top speed is pretty meaningless too, beyond a certain point. And most planes can only get to their advertised top speed with no exterior munitions or drop tanks, and with like less than a half a tank of fuel. And they can only do it in perfect conditions and for like a minute on full afterburner, making it worthless. The F-35 can rocket to its top speed with a full loadout and a full tank of fuel. Most dogfights occur at like mach 0.6 - 0.8 anyway. Top speed is a meme. Supercruise is very helpful, though. Getting high and getting fast without wasting a lot of fuel is very helpful in a lot of engagements. It gives your missiles more range and lethality if you can Obi-wan Kenobi your opponent's ass.
>>61655668Physics dictates that the F-35 CANNOT reach it's theoretical "top speed" when it is fully loaded with weapons and fuel. Which, by the way, will increase the size of the explosion when it flies too close to an S400 Site :)
>>61655736>Physics dictates that the F-35 CANNOT reach it's theoretical "top speed" when it is fully loaded with weapons and fuelAll fuel and weapons are internal, which is why it can. It's state top speed by the US government is with full weapons and fuel. Sorry, bro, you're wrong.
>>61655736F-35A can likely reach mach 1.8 in good conditions at altitude. Mach 1.6 is with full fuel and internal munitions. This has been tested and verified many times. It's not a theoretical number that's up for debate.
>I need a reliable 9mm that looks aesthetic as fuckSay no more.
The actual correct choice.
>>61655303Wrong 9mm, fagasaurus
>>61655442How much of a pain in the ass is this for EDC?
>>61655482I did it for about a year, you have to be motivated to do it, otherwise you’d just find a smaller more comfortable gun. The compact fits that bill, it’s roughly Glock 19 sized. I switched to the PX4 Compact since it makes sitting down much more comfortable
>>61655360>be me>6'7" BWC BREEDING BVLL>regularly carry HK.45 to meet ups and finger fuck each other's guns after playtime Can confirm that most cuckolds are 9mm bros, but that might be because it's the most sold caliber in the region. Had an older client with his gramp's original M1911 issued to him before becoming a legend in the Argonne. The thing still reeked like trench foot and ass.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/aerospace-news/2024/italy-plans-to-purchase-up-to-24-eurofighter-typhoon-multirole-fightersThey will have 118 eurofighters soon
>>61646394>>61646305>>61643009fucking nigger
>>61646394>>61654607Womp womp niggermutt, go suck your kike master's dick faggot
>>61641644>Buying Eurocope TyphoonIt is just as expensive as an F-35If they want to go cheaper, just buy the gripen then.
>>61654607>>61654667Ooh did I strike a chord Guido? How about you bow down to the country that perfected the slop that you call "Italian food".>you'll never be white btw
>>61654607>>61654667
>>61649678Oops, I accidentally dropped my entire shipping container of kudzu seeds onto the planet. I'm sure it'll be fine.
>>61632004I'm glad I just got one of these for a very low price. Everything about it is easy and inexpensive, from piloting to maintenance to spare parts. Nowhere near high performance, but it's a good solid MS that's a lot of fun for flying around and target practice.For serious work I've got an upgraded Jegan and a rebuilt Doven Wolf. Now that one was hard to get parts for, and don't get me started on the EFATF giving me shit about the INCOMs despite having all the paperwork in order.
>>61649678Dump one trillion tons of VX nerve agent and Agent Orange into the moon’s atmosphere’s then call it a dayThat or>>61649972Do this, it will probably be cheaper than making one trillion tons of chemicals and would be nicer.That or>>61650114>someone should post the canonical picture showing that Humans have bigger dicks than Na’viIt’s Human Boy Summer on Pandora all the time
>>61605590SINGULO'S LOOSE
>>61653862>Humans have bigger dicks than Na’vithey are taller so we wouldn't go in as deep, but they're much more slender so we'd be much girthier"short but fat" they'd describe oursbut IIRC the original movie lore (I've only watched it once) their bodies are much more robust right? it'd be a case of snusnu for humans
https://x.com/WarMonitors/status/1791469933655625933Yeah yeah war monitors brown etc etc But it looks like the rumors that a samad drone crashed into the MQ were wrong
I wonder why the USAF is flying Reapers into AD nets. Are these those passively-guided SAMs posted from before?
>>61651133Good for them. They needed a win.
>>61651907>>61651949>doing the CIA/military's job of sabotage Either they were directed by someone with connections to the americans or they are retarded
>>61654986Well it was shot down over marib a city that's not under Houthi control so likely the American based militas burned it downThat's why the video didn't have wreckage It wasn't in their territory
>>61654880Well our if the last 4 drones that were shot down. Only 1 of them had missiles so only 1 was used for a striking missing
Can we talk about gun minimalism? I'm relatively new to firearm ownership, have a pretty generous hobby budget and I'm trying to not go overboard with frivolous purchases as I have in other hobbies in the past - I don't want to end up with a bunch of shit to resell. What in your eyes constitutes gun minimalism and quality over quantity?
>>61636060I love it. I've considered selling off everything but my p2000sk and ar-10 (I can basically everything I'd want to with those), but I have several guns from family I can't sell and if I have to have 5 I might as well have 20.
>>61647972Pic related is also a Del-ton on a PSA lower.Has approximately 12,000 rounds on it. It is my first rifle that I've kept upgrading.Yeah it has nice accessories/optics. Nitride barrel, 1:9 twist. It's not even free-floated. Fixed sight block. Still less than 2.5 MOAI have much more expensive guns. This is the one if show up with if I needed it though because I trust it the most experientially.Not saying Delton = KAC but they're damn decent rifles
>>61654936>they're the .22, 12 gauge, .30-30 and .30-06 a flannel walrus has on his rackThat's pretty close to optimal if you only have four guns.
>>61636060doesn't matter how much you spend on the gun, the bottom guy will still die to someone with a PSA + thermals.thermals + NVG = king
>>61653170I think most people are a mixture. I have a few min maxed tactard setups but also quite a few collectibles and even shitty guns that have no real defensive value. I just like emI hate that the internet pretends you have to be 100% a fake soldier or 100% a boomer collector. I'm both
I like this handgun
It was a decent offering when it came out for the price.For a little bit this Ruger, the Shield 1.0 and PPS M1 were the only respectable single stack carry "wonder" 9's available.However, flash forward to 2024, it's pretty dated as far as capacity and other doo-dads.
>>61655443No I don't
>>61655443I have the 380 version. I love it
Still an affordable pocket carry gun. I like it too, OP.
