File: DSC02906.jpg (2.16 MB, 2048x1365)

2.16 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02909.jpg (2.29 MB, 2048x1365)

2.29 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02910.jpg (2.29 MB, 2048x1365)

2.29 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02912.jpg (2.68 MB, 2048x1365)

2.68 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02913.jpg (2.55 MB, 2048x1365)

2.55 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02916.jpg (2.47 MB, 2048x1365)

2.47 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02919.jpg (2.35 MB, 2048x1365)

2.35 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02933.jpg (2.24 MB, 2048x1365)

2.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

By "art lens" I'm assuming you mean some lens you built as an art project and not one of those wide aperture Smigmas? Looks like you missed focus in every shot except for the one of the blokes arses, very peculiar indeed.

>>4308402
lol. 35mm Sigma art lens. I was using soft focus deliberately.

File: DSC02960.jpg (2.65 MB, 2048x1365)

2.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308391
Can you cut to the chase and show us her tits?

>>4308401
He’s cute anon, what’s his name? Look at those adorable hrt buds

I can't unsee sigma's flat rendering

Once someone pointed out that sigma lenses were used to shoot top gun I'm starting to see it in peoples photos

Oh and it's the exact same rendering as the nikon Z 70-200 and 100-400

>>4308412
what does flat rendering even mean?

>>4308407
>her

>>4308418
It's a buzzword people use, but only after they find out it's shot through a Sigma. Tell them it's a Leica next time.

>>4308418
Too sharp wide open, washed out shadows, muted highlights.

>>4308418
All midtones all the time with an overly sharp subject and a bokeh blasted f1.4 background. No contrast, just definition. Look at leica sample photos for the polar opposite.

Is this really considered acceptable image quality for modern digital shooter? Just wow.

>>4308391
>>4308403
Looks like my fooji when i use AF

>>4308403
>I was using soft focus deliberately
>>4308453
Lmao this guy misses focus and thinks that saying it was done on purpose makes it look less bad.

>>4308434
So in fact it just means high quality optics?

>>4308456
Yes, soft focus in order to give a hazy, dreamy look to the subject

>>4308471
People here are pretty terrible for artistic stuff. Just do whatever that best realizes your creative vision

>cow ring

>>4308461
It's a "blank slate". Some people like it, others say its "flat" and "lacks soul" when they can't edit. Personally I'd still prefer something less flat, editing stuff shot with sigma art usually means darkening the shadows and pushing the white and black points to get more contrast.

File: DSC02930 1.jpg (2.11 MB, 2048x1365)

2.11 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02942.jpg (2.04 MB, 2048x1365)

2.04 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02956.jpg (2.37 MB, 2048x1365)

2.37 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02959.jpg (2.57 MB, 2048x1365)

2.57 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02937.jpg (2.43 MB, 1747x2048)

2.43 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	1747
Image Height	2048

File: DSC02936.jpg (2.85 MB, 2048x2048)

2.85 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	2048

File: DSC02913 1.jpg (2.8 MB, 2048x1365)

2.8 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

I like the colors. Not sure if I'd call that 'art', but hey, decent shots overall, people post worse shit here. The dude in the pictures has some pretty weird poses, though.

File: DSC02947.jpg (4.45 MB, 2048x1365)

4.45 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02948.jpg (4.44 MB, 2048x1365)

4.44 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

Nuffig meisje. Ik vind haar leuk.

>>4308502
Wat is deze

>>4308401
>>4308391
ISO?

>>4308509
800, but all photos are stepped down by 1

File: DSC02972.jpg (2.71 MB, 2048x1365)

2.71 MB JPG

>>4308480
yep thats the idea. 4chan will talk shit but i just like taking photos idc

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

happy trans girls make me sad because iwnbaw ;_;

>>4308516
>>4308481
>>4308453
>>4308441
>>4308434
>>4308428
>>4308420
>>4308412
>>4308411
>>4308407>>4308402


is this a man or a woman????

File: DSC02969.jpg (3.11 MB, 2048x1365)

3.11 MB JPG

>>4308518
Does it matter?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308518
Just because a girl looks a bit haughty.
Fucking loser. I wish you were closer I would end you and make this world better.

>>4308521
what does haughty mean

>>4308522
nuffig

>>4308518
It's a man, just like OP is a tranny snapshitter
I mean calling them snapshits is a stretch, as snapshits tend to actually be in focus and have some sense of natural beauty and aesthetics captured in the scene

>>4308531
99.99999% of photographs are snapshits
what matters is the meaning and happiness of the shooter.

Grim

Lesson learned OP: Defocus looks worse than diffusion filter

>>4308543
oh no he's going to find out about 1/4 black mist

>>4308403
Lol that lens does not have soft focus, so you just missed it completely

>>4308548
or worse, glimmerglass 1

>>4308553
>Lol that lens does not have soft focus, so you just missed it completely
you can have soft focus by just focusing on anything other than the subject. . .

>>4308577
99% of soft focus photos either used a special lens, or a filter medium (vaseline, hairspray, actual filter, etc) because defocus does other, weird things and just looks shaky with most lenses

like you took the photo as an earthquake started, or have parkinsons

>>4308578
it was on 1/50 so yeah

>The virgin zoomer: Paid $200 for a schneider hollywood black magic to put on their foolji and ttfartisans, had to apply for another credit card
>The cucked milennial: Turned his focus ring because he went broke buying sigma fart lenses, ate ramen for a week
>The chad boomer: smeared vaseline directly on his lens, didn't even bother to buy a $5 chinese UV filter

>>4308577
>you can have soft focus by just focusing on anything other than the subject. . .
lol, lmao even
>OOF is soft focus!

File: DSC02928 1.jpg (2.24 MB, 2048x1365)

2.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02960 1.jpg (3.04 MB, 2048x1365)

3.04 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308588
Why would you do that?

File: DSC02959 1.jpg (2.45 MB, 2048x1365)

2.45 MB JPG

>>4308591
autism

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308391
Does she know you’re creep posting her on a Sudanese artisanal camera obscura forum? Kinda weird desu.

thread almost makes me like white women
>>4308397
I kinda like this photo

There's just something bad about how things look with sigma lenses that isn't common to other sharp wide open lenses ie: nikkor S

>>4308594
>thread almost makes me like white women
why? she looks like a literal man

>>4308596
Is it the jaw or the cheeks that are slightly masculine? I'm not very good at analyzing people's faces
shes a solid 6/10

>>4308601
some people think literally every white woman who isnt built like a fantasy elf is manly and inside their fap folder is 9001 asian bitches

and this is an anime website

>>4308609
Is it the Adam's apple thinly disguised by the chocker?

File: IMG_1156.jpg (70 KB, 1000x800)

70 KB JPG

your photos are nice OP
and she is beautiful

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	71 dpi
Vertical Resolution	71 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	800
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>bad composition
>horrible color grading
>ugly out of focus quality
These are the peioke buying $1000 lenses

>>4308579
>can't be stable snapping a 35mm lens at 1/50
Work your technique what the fuck, i take photos on windy days with an 80mm equivalent at 1/50 and 1/3 of them come unblurry, no stabilization either

>>4308845
its called walking while shooting

>>4308845
Why do you go on the internet and type lies to strangers when you are upset?

>>4308845
Surely you have one you can show us, right?

File: 712ZiNjSXGL._AC_UF1000,10(...).jpg (112 KB, 998x1000)

112 KB JPG

These are objectively shit. I could have gone the rest of my day without seeing this. None of these are in focus and there's tons of motion blur in the indoor game hall shots.

This is a Sigma 35/1.4 ART you mean to tell me you are so shit at photography you have one of the best low-light 35mm lenses money can buy (because I have one too so I know) and you still fumbled getting her in focus and avoiding motion blur. Jesus Christ I could have nailed these on my fucking Pixel 7 better than you did. You spent all that money on a good lens and still couldn't buy any talent.

>>4308849

and you still fucked it up, that lens does f1.4 you mean to tell me you fumbled a low light shot with that kind of capability, this is like losing a boxing match to a retard with a cleft palate and a congenital hand deformity. You're not a photographer you're a GWC, Guy With a Camera and until you develop your skills and get more practice in, study the classics and then practice some more, you will never be a photographer.

God damn read a fucking book, this one, pic related. Don't come back here until you have done something useful with your pathetic excuse of an existence you grab-asstic piece of amphibian shit.

>>4308391
stay away from girls like her anon

>>4308875
bro probably had his shit on auto

File: IMG_1868.jpg (4.37 MB, 5202x3465)

4.37 MB JPG

>>4308866
>>4308871
sure, this was the day I bought a EF 50mm F1/8 II for night photography, for my APS-C camera.
I decided to explicitly test the lens at night to compare how many more T-stops it has over the 3.5-5.6 kit lens I have, which are absolutely abhorrent to use for fast-moving subjects at night. Dxomark has values but I doubt the accuracy. hence ignore the subjective content of the photographs, I don't even take street photos in the first place.
These lens suffer from coma wide-open.
>IMG_1868.jpg: File too large (file: 11.57 MB, max: 5 MB)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	EOS 1200D
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.10-179-g11240bc97
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.2
Lens Name	EF50mm f/1.8 II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:02:26 20:53:34
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	256
Color Matrix	132

File: IMG_1859.jpg (4.81 MB, 5202x3465)

4.81 MB JPG

>>4308897
you can really see the comas here, looks like its vertically blurred but the bushes don't lie
took 4 photos, took the 1st with AF which failed, the 2nd is shaky, the last 2 are fine; that was the 3rd one
>but you said it's windy
it was and I was standing right next to the corner of a building, which made it more intense,; the bushes in the photo waved way less than the tiny brushes standing right below me even though they were in the middle of nowhere. If i stood a meter back I'd be sheltered from the majority of the wind gusts but I'd then be standing in the spotlight
I am quite happy with the lens considering the measly 60 euro

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	EOS 1200D
Camera Software	RawTherapee 5.10-179-g11240bc97
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.2
Lens Name	EF50mm f/1.8 II
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72
Vertical Resolution	72
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Unknown
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	256
Color Matrix	132

>>4308391
>>4308392
>>4308393
>>4308394
>>4308395
>>4308396
>>4308397
>>4308398
>>4308401


I like your photos, OP.
Has that cinematic quality to it; like when you pause a movie and take a screencap kind of vibe.

>>4308849
Yeah dont do that

You need to shoot at fucking 1/2000 if you're moving while shooting

>>4308796
she is a demon, look at the literal malice in her eyes, not a flouride stare yet a prerequisite leading up to it, she is giving you a stare as if she wants to butcher your cock just because u are a man, that bitch is wild, the choker kinda seals the deal, she can't even muster a smile, a lot like if you told a demon to show positive emotion, that bitch is possessed, no amount of high quality lenses can give her charisma, all she can do now is perversion and manipulation, couldn't you find a sweeter girl to take photos of, she is giving me femcel vibes.

>>4308909
and even when she does giggle a little bit in the third pic, its a very jewish, goblin type of snide smile, so even when she can't help smiling it comes out as a goblin snicker, goddamn. People are blaming the lens but u need to find a better more natural model, the person u are photographing is just as important as your camera and your skills using it.

File: rawtherapee_CwoUlZsd7v.png (44 KB, 204x211)

44 KB PNG

>>4308897
>>4308902
p.s. 4chan's metadata reader is bugged and it's reading some other tag as ISO instead. It probably isn't aware of Canon-specific EXIF tags that I copy from the CR2 when exporting. Both were shot with ISO 800.

>>4308909
she's the opposite of a femcel, although she does have a tragic life that would make some people bitter and jaded like incels

t. Fuckbuddy

>>4308910
>>4308909
>I was molested as a child
I'm so sorry. A playful arcade doesn't suit her personality and she would look better if she were shot in front of an office building with a canon+L lens but you're just deranged here.

>>4308897
Remember this is the guy giving you advice

>>4308927
What are you implying here?

>>4308894
He's not like the other girls.

File: DSC02931 1.jpg (2.35 MB, 2048x1365)

2.35 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308924
i have a fucked up situation too eggs cost 7 dollars, u want a medal or smth?

File: DSC02941 1.jpg (1.88 MB, 2048x1365)

1.88 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308951
it's not improving

>>4308955
yikes

have you considered switching to a canon powershot s95 i think it would play better with your style

>>4308951
Greasy ass looking hair

File: DSC02941 2.jpg (2.15 MB, 2048x1365)

2.15 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: 1698358484316532.jpg (50 KB, 564x600)

50 KB JPG

>>4308518
Dutch women actually look like this
t. knower

>>4308987
If I see that fucking cat one more ti-

File: TPYBg03.jpg (108 KB, 1039x805)

108 KB JPG

>>4308587
This is quite cool. Keep it up, glad someone's got the balls to post actual pictures on /p/ when the threads are brimming with gearfags and assholes

File: DSC02940.jpg (2.83 MB, 2048x1418)

2.83 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1418

File: DSC02977.jpg (3.14 MB, 2048x1365)

3.14 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02927.jpg (2.23 MB, 2048x1365)

2.23 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

Its really harder and harder to tell if just a white wom*n or a tranny

>>4309010
no, worse

its bad photography. some people think just centering a non-fat woman in the frame is enough desu. total coombrains.

>>4309004
finally something not technically incompetent (framing aside) and objectively hideous (look your photography improves when you drop the troon)

File: DSC02900.jpg (948 KB, 2048x693)

948 KB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	693

>>4309004
>the only non blurry mess is a photo of other photos
really makes you think

>>4309064
imagine if OP had started with this one

she looks like she does stinky poos

>>4308391
sleep demon

>>4309064
Clean your fucking lens or sensor nigga

>>4308391
>>4308392
>>4308393
>>4308488
>>4308587
>>4308951
>>4309006
Cool aesthetic and great direction but unfortunately whatever soft lens effect you went for just looks straight up unfocused and amateur
As other anons have said there were better ways to go for soft lens
Hopefully you don't have a big ego and are willing to to take some of the critique and utilize it to improve

File: DSC02901.jpg (4.14 MB, 2048x1365)

4.14 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02901 1.jpg (4.91 MB, 2048x1468)

4.91 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1468

File: DSC02902.jpg (3.91 MB, 2048x1365)

3.91 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4309399
>>4309395
>>4309393
Ken-sama please update your reviews page

File: Katie_Rockwell_Growing.png (1.28 MB, 668x951)

1.28 MB PNG

>>4309405
I wish he'd update Katie's page.

>>4309407
I'd grow katie's family

File: DSC03008.jpg (3.8 MB, 2048x1365)

3.8 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02999.jpg (3.62 MB, 2048x1365)

3.62 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03007.jpg (3.59 MB, 2048x1365)

3.59 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4308518
It's a man. Look at the tiny malformed cone titties

>>4308441
>Look at leica sample photos for the polar opposite.
Provide RAWs comparing the two.
I'm willing to bet that you're just some dumb post-process nigger who is seething at someone using different presets or something. Snake oil, it sounds like.

Tell me.
Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?
How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?
Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?

>>4309997
>Exactly how much resolution do you believe a 24MP bayer sensor delivers?
Less than vision3 in 35mm.
>How detrimental do you think an OLPF (AA filter) is to image quality?
Very. Pixel level sharpness actually matters unless you're a boomer viewing from the back row. Later generations eschewed the reading glasses for 24/7 corrected vision, that's why we "pixel peep" and want retina displays now.
>Do you believe digital is or can ever be "too sharp"?
Digital is not sharp enough. 4x5 = 400mp, foveon.

>>4309006
>>4308997
>>4308972
>>4308955
>>4308951
>>4308587
>>4308493
>>4308492
>>4308488
>>4308401
>>4308398
>>4308397
>>4308394
>>4308392
>>4308391
i would of instantly deleted these photos when sorting my SD card
blur and out of focus looks like shit

>nooo i dont want it in focus or it will show all her ugly ass pimples and texture
learn to photoshop, what your doing looks worse

>>4308434
>washed out shadows, muted highlights.
You mean it has good dynamic range?

>>4309998
All 100% legit.
Would love to see some objectively sharper Leica lens shots though, I haven't really seen any "sharp" photos that aren't post-processed by either side of the camp.

>>4309998
confirmed poser (not even the french spelling)

>>4309004
Focus, at fucking last.

>>4309999
>would of
what does that even mean?

>>4308391
>>4308392
>>4308393
>>4308394
>>4308395
The problem is not really the composition here, although i guess it's never good to put the model in the center of the photo... But your colours are badly set. I get that you were in a place where there are tons of colours but you should have made a tone choice. It's better in the pics after those first though.

tits

>>4310723
or gtfo

File: DSC02846.jpg (2.3 MB, 2048x1365)

2.3 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02856.jpg (3.65 MB, 2048x1482)

3.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1482

>>4311673
>>4311674
little homoerotic but
BLACK AND YELLOW BLACK AND YELLOW color palette is attractive

File: DSC02976.jpg (3.79 MB, 2048x1365)

3.79 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03065.jpg (2.88 MB, 2048x1385)

2.88 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1385

File: DSC03049.jpg (3.01 MB, 2048x1365)

3.01 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03058.jpg (3.1 MB, 2048x1365)

3.1 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03043.jpg (2.74 MB, 2048x1365)

2.74 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03053.jpg (3.24 MB, 2048x1365)

3.24 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03055.jpg (3.65 MB, 2048x1365)

3.65 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03056.jpg (3.09 MB, 2048x1365)

3.09 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4312736
>>4312737
>>4312739
>>4312750
>>4313082
>>4313083
>>4313084
Holy fucking Ken Rockwell. These are awful.

Perfect example of why the raw file is such a finesse.

>>4313109
finesse?

>>4313111
These are the sort of colors you get when camera companies are allowed to spend zero effort on in camera colors under the guise of:
>serious shooters demand complete control over the final image
So you get a generation of aspiring photographers pulling the sliders around until they give up and buy a preset pack.

>>4310468
Fag

>>4313114
>i fag instantly deleted these photos when sorting my SD card
no... doesn't seem like it fits?

>>4313111
he is using "finesse" in an obscure way, similar to 'trick' or 'con'. It implies you are being 'finessed' into accepting something you shouldn't.

>>4313112
Color is mostly determined by the lens
Then the CFA specs and proprietary raw cooking
Then by the raw converters settings
Then by the display medium and room lighting

Imagine if you could not shoot raw. One camera equals one film stock. Not happy? New camera time or gearfag over lens color transmission until the end of time.

Also, AWB fucking up? Always. Have fun manually setting white balance all the time.

Oh wait thats how fujislug consoomers actually live
>omg must buy for the new film sim!

>>4313125
all that and it gets worse
8 bit color, 10 with limited compatibility, thats it
lossy format
being stuck with whatever shitty “sharpening” and “chroma/luma nr” the camera maker could fit on the shitty low-power chips that cameras must use in the name of battery life
if moire or fujiworms happen you are stuck with that

negative film unironically had more editing latitude and general utility than jpeg
jpeg = digital is worse than film period. only a fucking retard would accept this trash. 1hr photo automated printing does a better job. all digital photography looks like godawful soulless shit.
raw = ok, now digital is as good as consumer 35mm film… if you have like, 36mp, at least.

people mostly my age have no idea how much worse the average digital camera is compared to a $15 roll of portra in a cheapo nikon slr

>>4313127
Well you know, it's all about the right tool for the job. They want to have pictures of things, while you're out shopping for a personality that'll be like all cool and artsy and special and stuff to sate that desperate need at the core of your being. (Don't worry, it usually sates itself around the mid twenties.)

>>4313136
The bitchy insult at the end is an auto-L. Couldnt be more low test if you tried.
>dont do things well! dont care! Do the minimim AESTHETICS ARE IMMORAL
OK enjoy your drab box church, solid black outfit, and phone photos jebediah.

File: DSC03023.jpg (3.47 MB, 2048x1866)

3.47 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1866

File: DSC03085.jpg (2.91 MB, 2048x1365)

2.91 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

>>4311674
fucking hot...

File: DSC02849.jpg (3.27 MB, 2048x1170)

3.27 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1170

File: DSC02848.jpg (3.18 MB, 2048x1568)

3.18 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1568

>>4308391
You have to get in closer, don't be afraid to cut off the tops of the heads of your subjects

File: DSC03105.jpg (4.55 MB, 2048x1569)

4.55 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1569

>>4315481
>featuring Burt Dunlap in a Steel Urinal PissMatch (only on WWF Summerslam Pay Per View)

File: DSC02929.jpg (2.5 MB, 2048x1000)

2.5 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1000

File: DSC02941.jpg (2.7 MB, 2048x1365)

2.7 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC02940.jpg (2.44 MB, 2048x1325)

2.44 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1325

>>4316516
>>4316517
I want to do disgusting things to her

>>4316520
>her

>>4316520

More disgusting then taking terrible, out of focus pictures of her?

File: DSC02956.jpg (3.59 MB, 2048x1656)

3.59 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1656

>>4316517
This one has motion blur
>>4316670
While this one is crisp and the noise looks, dare I say it, filmic.
Tell that dude you can either have a septum or nostril but not both at the same time.

>>4316696
>and the noise looks, dare I say it, filmic.
thanks

spent 15 bucks on a fuji film preset pack LOOOOL

>>4316670
Kiss her for me...
>>4316696
>Tell that dude you can either have a septum or nostril but not both at the same time.
You are wrong about everything.

>>4316716
>Kiss her for me...
ive done more than that lol...

>>4316734
Did you tell her it was from me? If not, it doesn't count.

File: DSC03108.jpg (2.79 MB, 2048x1365)

2.79 MB JPG

>>4316736
Ok, next time I will tell her its from anon

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03111.jpg (2.62 MB, 2048x1365)

2.62 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC01406.jpg (3 MB, 2048x1427)

3 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1427

File: DSC03125.jpg (3.31 MB, 2048x1365)

3.31 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03123.jpg (3.07 MB, 2048x1365)

3.07 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC01396.jpg (3.04 MB, 2048x1336)

3.04 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1336

You still have 9900 pictures to take before you will make anything good, I've tossed shit that looked better than these.

Old /p/ would have bullied you into the Shadow Realm for posting these.

>>4316959
>You still have 9900 pictures to take before you will make anything good, I've tossed shit that looked better than these.
i just like taking photos because i find it fun (:

>>4316960

Well it's still better than the endless gear threads and it's a photo thread, which we rarely get anymore, so I'll allow it.

(:

Why is you exif missing on all of these? Harder to give feedback without it.
>>4316744
I miss her.

If nothing else, respect to op just for continuing to post even after the initial assblasting from everyone. Brave of your trans girlfriend to pose for photos for you.

>>4316982
idk, capture one wipes it out for some reason

>>4316987
thanks, i just like taking photos and sharing them ((:

File: DSC03124.jpg (4.1 MB, 2048x1365)

4.1 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03147.jpg (3.33 MB, 2048x1365)

3.33 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03163.jpg (2.76 MB, 2048x1365)

2.76 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365

File: DSC03164.jpg (4.7 MB, 2048x1573)

4.7 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1573

>>4317003
When you click export there is a checkbox at the bottom of the tab that says "show all options", check the box and it will allow you to export the exif data. It is disabled by default for some reason.

File: DSC01364.jpg (3.07 MB, 2048x1365)

3.07 MB JPG

>>4317055
it is checked indeed - I am using capture one pro from last year, idk if that should make a difference

the metadata seems to be unchecked i will try it now with this photo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M3
Camera Software	Capture One 15 Macintosh
Photographer	ryan d
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Brightness	-1.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1365
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal