Let me guess, you "need" more?
>>18095456yes. slightly more. i would break or lose those ones because i'm a retard & the folders fit my nose better.
>>18095458okay based can't really argue with this
i just want some persols, bros
>>18095456Yeah, I need higher quality and I don't like that type of acetate.
>>18095964What would you pick then?
>>18095968I'm a big fan of Matsuda. Extremely high quality. I own these M2040s but with black acetate. I'm posting this version to show you can get the brown acetate like the OP. They are just like a better version of Clubmasters.
>>18096038>clubmasters The onions choice
>>18096045Well yeah. They look okay, but they are both generic as fuck and low-quality because they are RayBan. That's why I suggested these instead.
>>18095456Oliver Peoples is all you need.
>>18096069>overpriced Luxottica brandthat being said, I really want a pair of their Gregory Peck frames
>>18095456No that’s exactly what I have. But mine are black.
>>18096078The blacks ones are just so boring to me Tortoise looks better
>>18095456Yeah, I have the meta raybans with built in video cameraPretty good
>>18095456the plastic is too thick and makes me sweat by the way it sits on my face
I stole like 25 sunglasses from different stores. My face is really ugly, and I'm too scared to try them on in front of pieces of shit. None of them look good, I kept them though because I finally have something interesting.
>>18096260Lose weight fatty
>>18095456wireframe just looks better on my face. a little more comfortable too io
>>18095456MONEY HOES AND CLOTHES ALL A NIGGA KNOWS
>>18095813has anyone on here bought persol's folding model? i'm v interested but i keep hearing mixed things on their quality, and quality matters a lot more with folders.
>>18096058name a better folding sunglass than rayban other than maui jims (they don't work on my face)i consider all non folding sunglasses pointless now. but there's not many alternatives to ray ban.
>>18096457I think most brands are better than Ray Ban at this point
>>18096457I can't, but to be honest I didn't realize folding was so important to you and I'm not aware of other glasses that can do it. If you are willing to compromise on other areas just to have folding glasses, then maybe RayBan is the right choice.
>>18096939>>18096457Persol makes folding sunglasses
>>18096074They are undoubtedly the best Luxottica-owned counterpart and, in terms of quality, are highly comparable to Leight when choosing a Japan-made frame.
>>18097014What is a non-luxottica equivalent brand?
buy some real glassespic related
>>18096260Imagine being so fat you sweat from the exertion of wearing sunglasses
>>18095456I wear a pair of port tanger because they were super cheap during the sales season, I prefer their designs in comparison. to brands like jacques marie mage.I look like shit on a pair of wayfarer, tried once at the mall and never put a pair on my face. But. I get it buying a pair as a one and done
>>18097124Port Tanger are so ugly to me
>>18097128I have these, I think that they are discontinued. But mine. also have black lenses.I cannot complain, bought them for like 80 bucks during the sales, I cannot complain.
>>18095456they are heavy and leave a mark on the nose when wearing longer than 20 min
>>18097169All sunglasses do this
I'm thinking of getting those Carrera, I like the styles and color
>>18097108Do you people only know JMM? They make good shit but I swear I only started hearing about JMM a ton after the whole succession fashion style wave.
>>18098067Are Carrera any good? Where are they made?
>>18096455the tolerances on the hinges can vary greatly, from tightly clicking into place to loosely flapping around. Tightening the screws can help, though this problem comes from the factory, not from use. If you want a pair, i would recommend buying a pair in person, so you can check the quality is ok.t. Persol wearer for 1 year.
The more my wardrobe has expanded, the more I need more pairs to suit different outfits. Desperately trying to justify buying the Walker JMM sunglasses.I really like sunglasses, I'm not one for jewellery so it's the only accessory I can wear, except for a gold chain in the summer.
>>18095456for me it's knockoff Clubmasters
>>18098193Why not just get Clubbie clones from a better brand?
>>18098557Ray Ban was sold to Luxottica and it's been a race to the bottom ever since. Modern pairs made today are mostly made in China
>>18098067Most carrera models are fucking based as fuck. 70s retro aesthetic, great lenses, solid build. I own 3 different pairs
>>18098113What are other options for chunky, high quality, hand made glasses?
With all this talk of folding sunglasses, I'm curious, what is the benefit exactly? Do they come with a case that can fit in your pocket? Because if not, what are you doing with them when you take them off? If they're just going to sit out somewhere, then they don't need the folding capability. Forgive me if I'm missing something, I just genuinely don't understand the hype behind this feature.
>>18095456*Presses dents onto the top of your nose*Nothin' personnel
What do you all think of clear frames? Fad or timeless?
>>18095456Nope. I have a pair of wayfarer sunglasses, and wear Oliver Peoples O’ Malley eyeglasses. Relatively cheap, look great, decently non autistic.
>>18095456Yes
>>18098153Slovenia, some in china
>>18098959Definitely not timeless
>>18095456I need something a little more high speed
>>18098816You can fold them up and put them in your pocket That's based
Yep
>>18099048Really not more convenient than regular glasses. The space you save in length you lose in thickness. I do not see the point of them.
>>18096045i would say thats true for the prescription glasses but not for the sunglasses
w2c clones? aooko doesn't make them anymore
>>18098966Imagine needing silicone earhooks as an adult
>>18099963pretty much any brand makes a wayfarer clonewhat's your budget?
>>18100110then what?
>>18095456I'm more of a aviator guy
>>18095456Honestly, no, that's enough
>>18100195pic rel
Thinking about making these $660 pair of handmade Deutsche sunglasses my one and done.
for me it's the Shooter(tm)
>>18100178under 75. picked some off zeny or something they are fine but not close to wayfayers
>>18100462Zenni makes complete dogshit. I have no idea why people mention them at all
>>18101375w2c?
>>18098677the classic ray bans are made in italy (clubmaster classic, wayfarer classic, round). people criticize rayban, but no one ever recommends another sunglass with glass lenses and acetate frames, and it's bc luxxotica makes money from volume like every other large business. they even have sales on their own website if you wait and know what you want. but if you think they're overpriced, go ahead and start your own sunglass company and do your own marketing and try to sell what ends up being $800 sunglasses. you can go into any city center and find a store that sells raybans in your size that will last for 10+ years. the only thing I dislike about rb is the logo on the front but it's not worth paying 4x for other brands without the logo
>>18101704Ray Bans don't have glass frames, and "made in Italy" is not the flex you think it is. Just because some Jeet in Italy made something doesn't mean it quality
>>18097108I'm not spending $800 for a pair of sunglasses with plastic lenses
>>18095456For me, it's the American Optical Saratoga It's better than the Wayfarer
can anyone ID these?
>>18102657N
>>18102657That's Djimon Honsou
G
>>18102722G
>>18095456Are polarized lenses even worth it?
>>18102764Yes, I'll never go back The ultimate sunglasses redpill is polarized Prizm lenses from Oakley. It's like seeing the world in HD
>>18102688>>18102722edgy & helpful
>>18095456>luxotica sloplol lmao
>>18098153Made in Italy
if you want wayfarers, get the ones made by bausch & lomb, those have the best lenses in sunglasses ever made
>>18103010>Luxottica is le bad because reddit said so
>>18103113dunno about reddit but shitxottica is bad because its production involves chinkeryfaggot
>>18103168>own loads of brands exclusively made in Italy >this somehow confuses and enrages the anon who can't afford them anyway
>>18103113What Italian designer brands do they not make?
>>18103174>made in italylol no one tell himI don't buy rayban bug fagkeep being proud about your empty shitxotica names made in "italy" lmaoonly reply when you can afford savile, matsuda or any other brand that hasn't touched chinese chinky hands pretending to be italian
>>18103200>chink self hating that his grandma got raped by the japslmao
>>18103200>dude, racism! you are so MAD! holy shit are you crying?
>>18100206looks like a pair i got at a dollar store for 1.50
>>18103174Why do you think that something being made in Italy makes it high quality?
>>18103434Just admit you're racist and it has nothing to do with quality, price, etc. You just won't buy something a Chinese person touched because you're racist But I'm sure 80 year old Bianca Mozzarella does just as good a job screwing hinges on with her shaking hands while she works next to Ranjeet Singh punching out acetate, but hey, all made in Italy, right?
>>18095456for me it's the
>>18102754R
>>18101715Why is /fa/ so autistic about glass lenses?>heavy (especially on JMMs which are already bulky>crack and shatter upon impact>limited options for tints and transitions Just use plastic, for 99% of people there’s no different. I recommend Essilor Eyezen.
>>18103517It's the classic old > new mentality. Nevermind polycarb lenses are just as good in every way
>>18103497Only right answer
>>18100110Lol my head is huge, I doubt you'd fare better with those glasses, especially while dancing in a club. I don't want them to fall off my face when I'm leaning down to do a line
>>18095456I don't want plastics in my face.
>>18103797Buy genuine horn or turtleshell glasses
>>18103437yellow chinky hands typed this
>>18103916Bro you've never even hugged a girl. Don't act like you're saving the white race being edgy on the internet You won't breed ever
>>18103437People of different races are different, and should be treated differently.
>>18096069Oliver Peoples is overpriced but I’ve bought 3 pairs of them because they just work so well for me
>>18104086I really want the Gregory Peck frames for my glasses as the Cary Grant frames for sunglasses but that's like $1k+ for both of those
>>18103922ching chong ping ling
>>18104235>I CAN'T BREED
>>18104247>racism outside of /b/
>>18104254cry about it
>18104271>he keeps going I can only imagine how red this dude's face is right now
>>18095456Yeah, I need an ID on these
>>18104416
>>18104224The greg pecks look dumb on me but if they work for you definitely go for it. This pair works so well for my face
>>18104086I can't really find a pair that suits me like OP so I might go for them. What models do you have? I've heard they vary in quality depending on the country they were manufactured in (Italy, Japan, etc)
>>18105201There are only three countries in the world that produce acetate, Japan, Italy and ChinaThe ranking for quality of eyewear goes in that order as well. Japanese acetate is considered the highest quality and Japanese craftsmanship is considered the best. Italian acetate is considered good, with Mazzucchelli 1849 produced acetate to be the best quality Italian acetate out there Then there's Chinese acetate which is considered the inferior option Knowing that all brands get their acetate from those countries, it then comes down to the individuals working in the factories in a specific country putting them together. In the USA it's probably Mexicans, in Italy it's Chinese workers, in Japan it's old Japanese people in their 80s
>>18105271Good to know, thanks. After searching around it looks like Oliver People's still have a lot of individuality outside of Luxottica but the ones made in Japan seem to be vastly higher quality than anything else in their collection in terms of build quality.Buying online it turns out to be cheaper than a lot of individual brands as well surprisingly. They don't seem to be any more expensive than any other brand from where I am in the UK.
Do they make make me look like a douchebag? YesDo I care? NoAre they overpriced? Yes Do I care? No. The Prizm polarized lenses are worth it to me
Ray Bans brown lenses are whack. I love acetate tortoise shell so I got some brown clubmasters and the color of the lenses makes me sick. My brown Maui Jims are in a completely different league. Even the G13 Ray Ban lenses are way, way better than their brown lens.
Anyone tried Ray Bans Chromance lens? I only like Ray Ban styles, but I actually need good lenses like Maui Jims.
>>18105587Can't you pretty much take any frames to an optometrist and have them cut lenses for you? I'm thinking of doing that, especially since optometrists typically have lots of options for their lenses
>>18095458Best sunglasses I've ever owned
>>18105610Idk, but that sounds more expensive than would be worth it for Ray Bans, unless you have a prescription.
>>18105610yesalso pro gamer tip if you (or parents if zoomer) have optical insurance that covers glasses and if you don't need vision glasses you can get free sunglasses once per year on most plans for the cost of your copay as long as you get an eye exam and have puck lenses cut + installed. you get to keep the original lenses too and they'll swap them in usually as long as you go in on a different day. just call your insurance and ask. im a burger might not work elsewhere. they let you out of pocket the difference if you want really expensive shit above your plan's limit too.
>>18105587i don't like their lenses either. i had puck lenses put into my folding wayfarers. the stuff my optometrist does gives way better visual clarity (i forget to take them off when the sun sets sometimes) but blocks enough light that i can comfortable stare into a rising/setting sun on road trips. they've been reasonable to get done when my insurance hasn't covered it, even if they costed more it'd be a no brainer turns any decent frames into S tier sunglasses.i won't wear glass lenses because if i did i would have lost my eye a few times already but thats a personal problem.
I remember Gargoyles glasses being the shit back in the 80s, after the U.S. military adopted them (in clear) and especially after Arnold wore them in The Terminator.
>>18105857$100 for non prescription in most places
>>18104437those arent even remotely simuliar are you dumb?
>>18106286no, dumbass he's saying use reverse search
>>18104224They tend to charge about $200 more for collaboration works like those but you can usually get that knocked off again by going to a place or site that sells under rrp.
>>18106802>get that knocked off again by going to a place or site that sells under rrp.Any suggestions?
>>18102764I’m a pilot, so, no.
>>18107017You can quite literally just type in the model of glasses you want to buy on a search engine and find them cheaper on most sites on the first page alone. Just do a quick review check on the site themselves for reliability and you're good to go. I'm UK based and recently got about £200 off the rrp with no issues.
>>18095456You guys are the most fashionable autists I know. Can anyone recommend a good pair of transition glasses that look like regular-old glasses? I used to wear glasses but ate a lot of carrots and stopped playing computerspiele. The ones I had were given to me by my ophthalmologist and were relatively thin height-wise, and rectangular-looking; they were pretty sleek. I want a pair of transition glasses that aren't prescription and look like regular old-glasses so I don't have to take them off indoors--too lazy to take them off every time I step indoors or go outside, better to just have them sitting on my face all day. It's very important that they aren't prescription because I don't want to ruin my sharpshooter eyes, and don't want to look like a faggot with shrunken eyes. I know that I am asking autists for help, so I must point out beforehand that I don't give a fuck about the brand, I'm not a brandfag; I'm not trying to impress anyone with my superior gentlemen-like fashion. I just want some glasses. Hell, I'd settle for some /csg/-tier glasses if it weren't for the fact that I'd be absorbing hazardous material into my skin by having them sit on my face all day.>>18095458>accidentally folds them the wrong way
>>18095456and which lens lolor is the most /fa/ Polarized or mirrored on the outside?
how is cutler and gross anons?i need a new optical soon
>>18108363>>accidentally folds them the wrong wayHow? Have you never owned a single pair of glasses in your life? You'd have to be a complete moron to fuck that up.
>>18108481I have only ever heard good things but I don't have any experiences personally
>>18108481>cute glasses anon, what are those?>gross
>>18095458Might look into getting a pair of these or folable clubmasters>>18098203I get my clubbie rip offs form ebay for £2.50
>>18108475I like mirrored lava red lenses. But mirrored lenses have a distinct mall glasses look, so I go with brown or grey lenses for good pairs.
my gut says that mirror glasses are tacky and cheap looking and distinctly mall-core like anon saidbut on the street my $2 gas station mirror glasses seem to get the most "those are cool!" and "where'd you get those?" especially by women so uhhh maybe i'm wrong and autistic.
I bought a pair of Persols and the glass lenses are too heavy to stay on my face. Even had the fit adjusted at Sunglasses Hut and they still won't stay on. Fucking waste of money. They're so cool, too.
>>18095456My latest cop. Heavy Tropic by crap eyewear
>>18108871Just like with anything else, it is usually the tacky stuff that normies recognize and compliment. But you are right, while being stuck in the mallcore catagory, mirrored lenses are cool and eye-catching.
>>18108855These are sick as hell though
>>18108485It's called an accident, retard. Have you ever shit your pants? Was it an accident, or did you do it on purpose like a based retard?
>>18109200LMAO
i just got a pair from Lacoste that i'm happy with.
Just saw these Salt frames in a movie on Netflix and now I'm obsessed with them
>>18108998Unfortunately when you wear them there is a horrible gradient that is so distracting. They look cool if you can past the mallcore thing, but to actually look through them is so distracting. It's even worse because the top is cool green, and the bottom is warm brown, and it splits right in the middle, where your eyeline rests, so any movement of your head changes what you are looking at from warm to cool colors and back and forth. It's actually awful.
>>18108475>>18095456Is there anything similar to picrel but as sunglasses?Like a hybrid of the Optic's oversized lenses and the classic Wayfarers frame curvature
>>18109439Maui Jim Kupaa
is this stupid?
I have to buy knock offs, I'm functionally retarded when it comes to sunglasses. Lost a $300 pair off a Kayak. Crushed $150 pair sat on another. Just cant bring myself to spend more than $30.
>>18109636Looks very ugly to me
20 bucks for a three pack
>>18109710What brand?
>>18109744Kaliyadi. How long they will last will depend how you treat them but they're decent.
>>18109439a optican can put in whatever lenses you like in most glasses. with or without diopters for like max 50€ per lens.
Polycarbonate, trivex, CR39 or something else? How do I know what is best and what should I go with?
>>18110747Glass is the best, but it's heaviest. The rest are all varying levels of pretty good. Gotta do your research if you really care which brands proprietary plastic is more clear.
>>18110961I think the consensus is poly is the "worst" and trivex and CR39 are better but each are good in different ways. One does something better than other but worse in other ways I have glasses with trivex lenses and they don't have a single scratch after a year of owning them
>>18110961>>18110965what about nylon lenses?
>>18111000Nylon lenses are great but not used very often unfortunately
>>18102722That’s a Digimon?
>>18111514No, it's a ni
>>18110747>>18110961>>18110965i woud say there is only a difference between glass and plastic materials.and for the plastics the thing that matters is the coatingpoly nylon or cr39 would all scratch to shit if left un coated. but they are never sold without a coating. and i have a feeling that even the cheap coatings have evolved quite a lot in the last 10 years or so. the key to never having scratches is only cleaning the glasses with soap under the tab or in a ultra sonic cleaner. T. 2yo poly glasses have no scraches thanks to my 15$ US-cleanerbtw at work i have prescription safety glases cr39 i even use to cutt and grind steel or drill in concrete and they have no scratches. Glass being super scratch resistant would get burn marks from angle grinding ( steel sparks tend fuse with glass or ceramics)
>>18095456I probably need some underpants too or I'm gonna get arrested
>>18098708Vada
im an incel but aviators make me look like a chad
>>18103437>You just won't buy something a Chinese person touched because you're racistNot him but yes, and also because it's almost certainly shit.
>>18112419Cringe
>>18100198I got two pairs of yellow aviators, one with thick black rims and one with thin metal ones, shit's based as fuck
>>18113865He's right, why would you buy chinaslop
>>18114380Cringe
>really nice brands cost 500+ just for frames, lenses are 500 too >brands like RayBan cost 200Meanwhile >Warby Parker, EyeBuyDirect, Zenni, etc cost 20-90Literally why the FUCK are glasses so expensive when it's obvious they can be made cheap
>>18114405The price is right for the shitty glasses because you're paying little for a shitty product. On the other hand, you're paying far more than the cost to produce the good glasses because they have demand that warrants them. They may be overpriced for their practical value, but you actually are getting something good. (This is assuming you are actually getting the good ones and not the brand name shit that sells based off of name alone.)
Thoughts on Masunaga and Philippe Starck? I have to buy glasses as an adult for the first time and need something that will last a long time and work well in the office (academia) as well as in my free time. Someone recommended a shop in my city and Masunaga is the only Japanese brand they have. For some reason, that makes me trust the brand more, craftsmanship and all that.
All my raybans feels like trash they just have a trash vibe now I can't shake it they are just trash. My nicest pair I have to keep tightening a hinge scerw. can't believe I bought so much mall trashI'd only buy those meta wayfarers because they have a camera for creepshotting but theyhave a stupid light on them.Reddit told me to lookup seregeti, etna barcelona, r-something enginering, american whatever... serengeti are on amazon at up to 1/3 price sounds too good to be true
>>18109244what movie
>>18098067My carreras have been to hell and back and barely have a scratch. They are a safe bet on most head shapes, I rarely buy sunnies online but was pleased with the fit and qualityfor under $200 USD you'd be crazy not to buy a pair
>>18115398i dunno man, my original wayfarers are amazing, i've had them for almost a decadethe new wayfarers feel cheap in comparison
>>18101706>some Jeet in Italyhttps://youtu.be/MjvLXnDPtJc
What are some good sunglasses to drive at night with?
if you paid more than 20 bucks for your sunglasses you got ripped off
>>18116524How would you know? You've never owned any nice ones before
>>18116508Mazzucchelli is not making RayBan's acetate
>>18115398i'm so glad i bought ray bans before the brand degraded.sounds like there's literally NO OTHER MANUFACTURER ON PLANET EARTH other than maui jim who can make sunglasses with tolerances good enough to do a half decent folding pair. guess i already have the absolute end game pinaccle of sunglasses based on the degradation in quality over all in the market over the last 2 decades. just regret not buying a second pair in black.
>>18116730There are still plenty of brands making amazing quality sunglasses with top notch materials. The thing is that with Bidenflation and the current global economy, they cost 500-1000 dollars now instead of 200 like they used to
>>18109646i used to be that guyget the folding maui jims and a microfiber bag you'll stop losing/breaking sunglasses
>>18116732>There are still plenty of brands making amazing quality sunglasses with top notch materialsi don't think that's truewhat brands make good folding sunglasses right now?maui jim and who else?i can spend up to maybe 3000 dollars.
>>18109646It looks nerdy as hell but if you're gonna be doing kayaking or something like that with nice sunglasses, wouldn't you wear something like pic?
>>18116738Do they absolutely have to be folding? Is it a deal breaker if they're not? Seems like you're several limiting yourself that way
>>18116740>Do they absolutely have to be folding? Is it a deal breaker if they're not? yes. i want sunglasses that are comparable in quality and function to my ray bans. not something worse. i can double my budget if need be. who can i buy sunglasses from that are at least as good as my ray bans? money is no object.
>Luxottica
>>18116810No one has ever been able to say why they're bad beyond them hurting their feelings
>>18116811Poor construction on most, Had the lenses fall out on a fair few, arms get loose quickly.
>>18116814Completely brand dependant If you buy some shitty Gucci glasses then yes, probably true
>>18116811monopolies and cartels are inherently bad
>>18116815I was suprised it happened to my raybans, Currently have a nice pair of Paulsmith ones that "feel" good, time will tell
>>18116817What are they monopolizing?
>>18116745Get Persols you fucking retard
>>18096261How to do this?
Yes because I'm a sperg with sunnys, loose them but thats probably because I go outdoors alot.2 Pairs Italians1 Pair Ray Bans1 Pair Oakley (knock off)2x Generic Australian pairsAt the rate I break them I'll be down to 2 pairs within 2-3 years lol. Probably buy a metal frame hiking or military grade next time.
>>18095456Too much frame, clunky, cheap, unrefined. A design for poors.
>>18117226Never understood how people break their nice things
>>18114511I loved my Masunagas but they eventually broke, the frames were relatively thin and my stuff gets really abused.
Anyone owned Oliver Peoples? I'm pretty much set as far as my sunglasses collection goes but I'd like a pair of Persols and Oliver Peoples, but those would also be the most expensive of collection if I bought them
>>18117057i've been asking about them on here. everyone who replies saying they own them says the tolerances on the hinges is poor and the quality over all is poor.>retardi'm not the one who can't come up with a sunglasses rec on a $6000 budget... maybe you wereWRONG?
>>18117684>spoonfeed me No.
>>18095456thoughts on wearing these as prescription glasses?
>>18116920glasses.
>>18117896too chunky and thick for me personally, but loads of people do it. they sell optical versions
>>18117914almost all of those brands are "designer" trash that anyone that knows better would avoid. pretty much anything on the right of the image is trash anywayi don't like seeing what they've done to rayban and oakley. persol and oliver peoples being owned by them sucks though the worst thing about them though is that they control the insurance
Going to Italy in October and need some shades. Can anyone ID these or know of similar type glasses?
>>18117980Lol
>>18117527what frame is in the pic? looks good and i need those
>>18095456Hey does anyone know of a good, fashionable hard case for these? The one that comes with them is soft and I’m paranoid about them being crushed in my pocket.
>>18118472Not sure, sorry. I got them in 2019 at Lunettes in Berlin and didn't record the model. Couldn't find them on the Masunaga site either.
>>18117914My Matsudas aren't associated with Luxottica. They are also peak quality. Perhaps there's a correlation? Try looking for better brands, and you'll see it's not actually a monopoly.
>>18119485Matsuda makes some of the ugliest glasses of all time
>>18102802Polarised prism lenses in the bright orange is where it's at. Colours are so beautiful and vivid it literally looks like you're tripping. Literally cannot get a better pair of lenses on sunglasses imo
>>18119970Any models with those lenses? I have the Holbrooks in blue but I'd get another pair
>>18119970I tried this specific oakley configuration and damn is this anon correct, colors pop without actually hurting your eyes, there was barely any shadowy tint that it felt like I was wearing glasses again. Shame the only model available was ugly as fuck, it did sit snugly on my face so that's something to its favor.
>>18120006the thing with oakley is the lenses are amazing and the technology is really cool. but the frames are just cheap nylon junki would gladly pay more for their lense technology, but the frames not matching that quality for the price is disappointing
what do you bros think of the sunglasses charlie hunman wears in sons of anarchy? was thinking of picking up a pair and they're cheap
>>18102802>>18119970>>18120006>>18120075Since most Oakley sunglasses are ugly as sin, but their lenses are some of the best, which model would be the best to get if I don't want to look like a clown?
RB2191 901/58 5418
>>18109710Have you tried not being poor?
>>18119959Well, I can understand why you would be worried about a Luxottica monopoly if you can't see the aesthetic value or quality in other brands. Hopefully you can grow to appreciate them more, and realize that a monopoly on garbage isn't really a monopoly.
>>18120355>if you don't think objectively ugly glasses are good then you're le bad
>>18120141Too small. Gives off 2000s vibes
I wore my Wayfarers today after not touching them for a long time because I have other sunglasses and they just feel good. They really are almost the perfect frames
>>18120357Good thing modern fashion is just 2000s fashion
>>18120233Terrigals look relatively good imo. Give me 90s industrial vibes
>>18120545Cool.
should I get some Gucci sunglasses? Love the web
>>18120592yes, anon. absolutely you should
What does /fa/ think about rimless sunglasses? Like these examples>>18098193>Advertising which is just a women's thighs behind the productI'm instantly sold, whatever it is
